Vid of unsupervised bot

[Taiku]

ban this botter

[Castle2.0]

OP Good job. Its kind of funny wasn't long ago guy caught someone at SF mills doing same thing was a post. (guy made a toon with like same npc toon name, and the bot kept nuking him instead lmao) But Kudos for recording it, hope GMs bring the Ban hammer down.

That was me busting the cheater [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] See thread here: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=347232


If you take your time to document with photos and contact GMs (and a GM is on while they are botting) they will take care of them.

Photo proof GMs do NOT put up with botting at the Steamfont Windmills:
https://i.ibb.co/BtKyRT6/EQ000343.png

P.S. Did Warrio (the botter) reroll and is back at it again?

[drackgon]

Probably did. Or just one of his many accounts hes got going at same time. Mages are ez to bot and afk with. Wouldn't surprise me If he sets up like 12 accounts, and just hopes 1 or 2 makes it..

[Canelek]

I play a mage mainly and it certainly feels robotic at times due to the simplicity of the class. But yeah, nuking corpses consistently is pretty obvious. Hell, I even "loot" mobs who do not drop loot out of habit from when Abu boxes were dropping, not to mention refreshing buffs.

[annali]

Ban hammer is yet to swing, Audena currently in Rivervale. ;(

[douglas1999]

Remember you can't PROVE somebody is botting unless you can literally read their mind and have clairvoyant access to their brain. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, they might have just been distracted by their nephew!

[douglas1999]

Just like all the duos I see where one character is autofollowing. I've played this game for 20 years, I don't think I've ever once autofollowed anybody outside of like the first month I played. It's so glitchy and undependable there's no reason to do it if you're not boxing.

[Evia]

Wow... Pretty clearly botting.

Surprised we got ppl trying to white knight this behavior.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Remember you can't PROVE somebody is botting unless you can literally read their mind and have clairvoyant access to their brain. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, they might have just been distracted by their nephew!

This is just wrong. The staff has a two-box test, and it's very successful. Testing a single boxer (botter) is even easier.

Also, for the record, I use auto-follow sometimes. Just depends on where I am and how lazy I feel.

[douglas1999]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is just wrong. The staff has a two-box test, and it's very successful. Testing a single boxer (botter) is even easier.

Also, for the record, I use auto-follow sometimes. Just depends on where I am and how lazy I feel.

Yeah, I wasn't saying 100% of people who autofollow are boxing. Only like... 90%.