#31
|
|||
|
I was a druid in kunark and my wildfires only did 1024, that kunark spdat seems very wrong.
Did we base our current spells on that spdat? if so I feel bad for this server. | ||
#32
|
|||
|
http://thedruidsgrove.org/archive/eq/t-14630.html
http://www.crys.org/everquest/spells...=49&maxrank=60 another post about wildfires doing 1024 damage -- that kunark.spdat seems fubar. Would. Not. Use. I can't find any combination of "wildfire everquest 1144 damage kunark" on google. While theres endless pages about 1024 damage wildfires. | ||
Last edited by Nizzarr; 04-03-2013 at 02:24 PM..
|
#33
|
|||
|
nizzar scoring big points in favor of clasicness
pras | ||
#34
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
#35
|
|||
|
Wheelchair been smoking too much computer
| ||
#36
|
||||
|
Quote:
Some of these spells you want changed in this thread have cast time/mana cost/damage that are the same as this Kunark beta one but differ in the Velious /shrug. | |||
#37
|
|||
|
they seriously used the beta spdat for most of these spells here? no wonder about the discrepancies.
| ||
#38
|
|||
|
Those two spdat's are the only ones I know of that are available.
| ||
#39
|
|||
|
Assuming the Velious spdat was from live, it would've been far more accurate to have used that and reconciled Kunark-era differences with archived evidence than to implement beta data that obviously never went live.
| ||
#40
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|