New Angry Goblin Agreement

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By definition, any system you propose will have winners and losers.

Yeah no doi. That's why they want to get points so the more losses they have wont continue to accrue while some rich kid gets it first time.

It's called sociaism.

Why do you right wingers hate socialism!!

[BigChief]

Originally Posted by Salaryman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pvp for it, RED 99

Both people on it?

[cd288]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here's the thing: no agreement is going to make more goblins spawn. That's what you all really want, but since you can't make it happen you're trying to trick others into giving their chance at a goblin to you.

By definition, any system you propose will have winners and losers. By definition, half the people at the current roll will be losers if the system changes (... and in all honestly, I think some of the people who think they would be "winners" will actually be losers in the new system).

So you're welcome to try and get half the people at the agreements to vote against their own interests (and against classic EQ) ... but again, I don't think it's going to happen.

It's not really purely against their own interests though. It's reducing their chance now in order to guarantee a much higher chance later. I'm not doing Angry Goblin, but personally if I were I would view that as a much better trade off than just perpetually rolling.

People do this with the URN system for example. It's not like it's totally unheard of for there to be a player agreement that essentially awards you DKP for being at the camp.

Seems like a pretty fair system to me. And it's technically not unclassic if it's a player agreement since there were player agreements in classic (it would be unclassic if the staff just decided to create this system).

[Toxigen]

the difference w/ drusella is that you need people to hold the camp for a long ass time

angry is a roll, sorry you dont got SWC

[PatChapp]

I bought every piece of this quest

Skargus head mq,urn mq
Friend of mine mq a sinew for me

Imagine not just buying it all,what a nightmare.

[Knuckle]

At this point im more amused at the thought of people being ANGRY their odds of winning the roll increase after each loss...Yeah no ones going to feel that way.

[Duik]

All pvping for it would mean is that the people always getting it would shift.
Which ever guild/group of people that brings the boom wins.
Still a sweatfest.
Also red players would infect the pve servers with their special brand of entitlement. Sure pvping is a skill. But unless its IRL pvp it is only hollow elf points victories.

Pvp works for red. Lolocaust if 60 max pop is "working".
Also also, if ya wanna pvp on blue ya can book it or /duel.

Off ya pop ya dress wearing ranger.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Off ya pop ya dress wearing ranger.

My head canon it is a poncho or full cloak, cos what other long attire would be suitable for rangering? A robe would be just about as practical as high heels.