#3671
|
||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Honestly I am just glad you really agree with me. You just want to troll for whatever reason. Probably for fun. I think that is /thread.
__________________
Shamwowi Wipesalot (60 SHM) | Bazgek Bonebreaker (60 SK) | Sznake Pliszken (52 MNK) | Laanfear (30 ENC)
Do you have questions about Shaman races? Read my guide: https://wiki.project1999.com/Shamwow...man_Race_Guide Want to see Shaman videos? Check out my youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFU...zEFJVBIH3-jUog | |||||||
#3672
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Quote:
DSM simply has not addressed/replied to/acknowledged/defended/challenged/attempted to refute the following: DSM has repeatedly provided copy/pastes which simply do not contain any evidence or data of his Shaman performing DPS - or any other action/activity - in an environment/context/scenario that is (or would be) relevant to the discussion; hence his copy/pastes are irrelevant to this discussion. While DSM is - seemingly - unable or unwilling to provide relevant evidence/data that supports his many claims/statements/positions (which change when he moves the goalposts & edits his posts), I have irrefutable proof of the following, which DSM has as of yet not addressed/replied to/acknowledged/defended/challenged/attempted to refute: Here is irrefutable proof/evidence - which cannot be refuted, and which is self-evident - of DSM attempting to move the goalposts by bringing a 5th "pocket" character into his "arguments" (even though this is intended to be a civil discussion - not an argument) pertaining to the "Best 4 person all caster/priest group" discussion": Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
For these reasons - which I have repeatedly stated - I am not sure which particular/specific belief/claim/stance/"argument"(s) that DSM is currently holding/defending/"arguing"; it would be helpful if he could elaborate/clarify/specify for the sake of civil discussion. I am also not sure why DSM has continued to copy/paste his - irrelevant - data, after this exchange occured - which cannot be refuted & is visible and clear in the cleary visible post history - which DSM simply has as of yet not addressed/replied to/acknowledged/defended/challenged/attempted to refute: Quote:
Quote:
The ball is in DSM's court if he has relevant, factual data to support his various positions/claims/"argument"(s) - and is willing to clarify which particular position/claim/argument(s) he currently holds/"argues", as they change when he moves goalposts or edits his posts - and/or if he would like to provide the definitions he is using for "troll"/"trolling", "nonsense", "silly", "vitriol", "new" and "win" for the sake of civil discussion hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||||||||||||||
Last edited by cyxthryth; 09-18-2022 at 08:34 PM..
|
#3673
|
||||
|
Quote:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
#3674
|
|||||
|
This will be my last post. Consensus has been reached. The trolls simply don't want to admit it, and will continue to post nonsense.
Quote:
Quote:
Honestly I am just glad you really agree with me. You just want to troll for whatever reason. Probably for fun. This is /thread.
__________________
Shamwowi Wipesalot (60 SHM) | Bazgek Bonebreaker (60 SK) | Sznake Pliszken (52 MNK) | Laanfear (30 ENC)
Do you have questions about Shaman races? Read my guide: https://wiki.project1999.com/Shamwow...man_Race_Guide Want to see Shaman videos? Check out my youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFU...zEFJVBIH3-jUog | ||||
#3675
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also LOL you actually think Troxx agrees with you? That's hilarious. You have a really odd way of reading things. | |||
#3676
|
|||
|
DSM practically reveals himself when Troxx said he thinks Shamans are 2nd best class in the game, yet votes for mage in this hypothetical group.
"You keep preferring shaman over mage" -- exposes that he's doing this because we think the shaman is a bad class, rather than totally unneeded in this 2 charm group. DSM, I don't know if you have a mental disorder or not, but you have issues regardless. | ||
#3677
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
#3678
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
#3679
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Quote:
DSM simply has not addressed/replied to/acknowledged/defended/challenged/attempted to refute the following: DSM has repeatedly provided copy/pastes which simply do not contain any evidence or data of his Shaman performing DPS - or any other action/activity - in an environment/context/scenario that is (or would be) relevant to the discussion; hence his copy/pastes are irrelevant to this discussion. While DSM is - seemingly - unable or unwilling to provide relevant evidence/data that supports his many claims/statements/positions (which change when he moves the goalposts & edits his posts), I have irrefutable proof of the following, which DSM has as of yet not addressed/replied to/acknowledged/defended/challenged/attempted to refute: Here is irrefutable proof/evidence - which cannot be refuted, and which is self-evident - of DSM attempting to move the goalposts by bringing a 5th "pocket" character into his "arguments" (even though this is intended to be a civil discussion - not an argument) pertaining to the "Best 4 person all caster/priest group" discussion": Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
For these reasons - which I have repeatedly stated - I am not sure which particular/specific belief/claim/stance/"argument"(s) that DSM is currently holding/defending/"arguing"; it would be helpful if he could elaborate/clarify/specify for the sake of civil discussion. I am also not sure why DSM has continued to copy/paste his - irrelevant - data, after this exchange occured - which cannot be refuted & is visible and clear in the cleary visible post history - which DSM simply has as of yet not addressed/replied to/acknowledged/defended/challenged/attempted to refute: Quote:
Quote:
The ball is in DSM's court if he has relevant, factual data to support his various positions/claims/"argument"(s) - and is willing to clarify which particular position/claim/argument(s) he currently holds/"argues", as they change when he moves goalposts or edits his posts - and/or if he would like to provide the definitions he is using for "troll"/"trolling", "nonsense", "silly", "vitriol", "new" and "win" for the sake of civil discussion hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||||||||||||||
Last edited by cyxthryth; 09-18-2022 at 09:21 PM..
|
#3680
|
|||
|
Now that DSM is done posting quick summary of the thread for all the silent readers:
Consensus for best 4 person caster/priest group is Enc/Enc/Clr/___ some say another enchanter (my personal vote if we really wanna min/max) but situationally either a mage or a necro would be a better option. It is unanimously agreed that shaman has no place in this group if you truly want the BEST 4 person caster/priest makeup for the vast majority of situations. In fact most people seem to agree shaman is the 2nd least favorable option only beating out Wizards who unfortunately are just a really shitty class for grouping in general. Side tangents about warriors soloing better than enchanters and mages being a "teleport class" are comically false and I hope nobody actually took any of that seriously. I'm quite certain anyone that knows anything about this game got a good chuckle out of someone even suggesting those things. I hope this has been educational and thanks for coming to my TED talk! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|