#11
|
|||
|
not resisting initial ice or fire chant at 200+ resist is stupid sorry youlath
used to be resistable around 100+ | ||
#12
|
|||
|
These were resisted constantly on naked characters during Velious. This is broken.
| ||
#13
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | |||
#14
|
||||
|
http://wiki.project1999.com/Tuyen%27s_Chant_of_Flame
http://lucy.allakhazam.com/spell.htm...43&setcookie=1 https://web.archive.org/web/20010505...asp?SpellID=27 Quote:
Not sure how it can be aruged to be unresitable. Its not flagged as unresistable such as malo or tash is and it does not have a -300 fire mod like lure spells. Wayback machine, has guy saying it can be hard to stick on mobs. This song was not flagged any different in pvp. Bards always had to fiddle with their chants to find your lowest resist so they can get other chants on. | |||
#15
|
|||
|
Usually resulted in them sticking cold one or two times after tonnnns of attempts on me (this was with blue diamond gear tho)
| ||
#16
|
||||
|
Quote:
Did you read and consider that crap, before quoting it and presenting it as "proof"? Good for you I ain't a mod. | |||
#17
|
|||
|
It wasn't hard to resist at all really bud, promise
| ||
#18
|
|||
|
Its just really terrible proof, that's all.
| ||
#19
|
||||
|
Quote:
Unresistable spells land on mobs even if they have higj resists | |||
#20
|
||||
|
lasher has come a long way from arguing that druid epic should be unresistable and unlimited range to this, good boy, i agree with everything mr horsecock has said, there's no evidence at all that the chants were unresistable, actually there's some evidence that they weren't.
__________________
Quote:
Wipe it clean. | |||
|
|