![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should the sleeper awaken script be implemented? | |||
| Yes. |
|
193 | 48.01% |
| HELL NO! |
|
209 | 51.99% |
| Voters: 402. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
the EQmac community needed someone to spike their drink [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'd be lying if I said there weren't large quantities of schadenfreude ingested. EQMac ubers treated people so poorly who tried to join them, maybe it was as Rellapse said, "Gods work". | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
some str8 nerds though i will not deny | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Killed was later, yes Ele, that's what I was mentioning. But only 7 on your list was when he was awoken before Luclin was released. Luclin release was Dec. 2001.
__________________
Rebbon - BDA
Happy Epic Mage | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Sorry, I see what you said. Yes, I meant to say LoDN, not Luclin.
__________________
Rebbon - BDA
Happy Epic Mage | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
So, technically speaking, he will NEVER be killed on P99 because that bug will never exist. There is no historical data saying that the sleeper had that regen bug from the beginning.
So again, my take is that I think there is an argument that supports NOT waking the sleeper because it didn't happen across the board (all servers before luclin release) and the flip side to that is he was awakened on a few servers before luclin and the capability is there.
__________________
Rebbon - BDA
Happy Epic Mage | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
I don't know the full history and could very well be wrong. Was IB = TSE/Resistance? Thought that was where the sleeper waking crew came from
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
thanks for contributing to the discussion, Bruno!
my point was IB already woke the sleeper against one servers wishes. what chance do you think blue99 has? | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|