Victim disarmament zones

[aowen]

http://chronicle.com/article/All-Gun...-Equal/136805/

History article of the 2nd amendment

[Stinkum]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[r00t]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[r00t]

The reason the 2nd amendment wasn't addressed earlier is because it was de facto/common knowledge that everyone should have a gun

[aowen]

Guess you didnt read that article, typical.

[r00t]

Except the slaves. Throughout history, only slaves have been disarmed.

[aowen]

Reinterpreting, amending, etc the constitution is an example of working within the limits of the system. Also you were all hell bent on correlation vs causation, whereas my thinking is constitution, not the document, but the regular meaning of the word for which the document is named. Figure I might as well get that out of the way while you're pulling shit from other threads and arguments that everyone else has moved on from

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reinterpreting, amending, etc the constitution is an example of working within the limits of the system. Also you were all hell bent on correlation vs causation, whereas my thinking is constitution, not the document, but the regular meaning of the word for which the document is named. Figure I might as well get that out of the way while you're pulling shit from other threads and arguments that everyone else has moved on from

You signed a social contract, get over it. It means everyone can have guns, and so you get no option to the contrary.

[aowen]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You signed a social contract, get over it. It means everyone can have guns, and so you get no option to the contrary.

Actually I said it's a tacit agreement, you're just an idiot. Second I also said while there is social contract, that doesn't mean you live in a static environment where no change can happen within the system. So you're argument is retarded. When I referred to a social contract, which is what democracy is founded upon, I was saying you have to working within the confines of the system to institute change, rather than trying to do away with the government/system entirely

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Actually I said it's a tacit agreement, you're just an idiot. Second I also said while there is social contract, that doesn't mean you live in a static environment where no change can happen within the system. So you're argument is retarded. When I referred to a social contract, which is what democracy is founded upon, I was saying you have to working within the confines of the system to institute change, rather than trying to do away with the government/system entirely

My argument is retarded because it's your exact same argument turned around to this situation. Perhaps now you have a chance to learn from your previous mistake. Or perhaps you'll continue to fight tooth and nail to not learn anything.

Keep in mind that in the other thread, nobody said anything about doing away with the government/system entirely.