5-4 incoming?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

And yes, if you support Cuties then you enjoy watching underage children in a sexualized way. That's pretty bad, regardless of what state you live in.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And yes, if you support Cuties then you enjoy watching underage children in a sexualized way. That's pretty bad, regardless of what state you live in.

The only person who keeps repeatedly bringing up a movie that apparently only pedophiles love here is you, buddy.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only person who keeps repeatedly bringing up a movie that apparently only pedophiles love here is you, buddy.

So, you can't refute the point about Cuties. Democrats love that movie.

[New_Guy]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yup, you can't refute the point about Cuties. Democrats love that movie.

So someone just said this French Movie was filmed in AOC's labia and loved by democrats and you believed it without a single shred of evidence to support it.

How does that not make you an idiot?

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by New_Guy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So someone just said this French Movie was filmed in AOC's labia and loved by democrats and you believed it without a single shred of evidence to support it.

How does that not make you an idiot?

AOC voted against the democrat infrastructure bill.

Who's the idiot?

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, you can't refute the point about Cuties. Democrats love that movie.

Do you know what a straw man is?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you know what a straw man is?

It's not a straw man:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...find-lot-like/

Last time I checked Washington Post is pretty left, and they haven't taken down this article.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Agreed! I never said all Democrats, or all Republicans, you can check the post history.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, you can't refute the point about Cuties. Democrats love that movie.

The "all" is pretty clearly implied there. If I say "cats love chasing mice", it's clearly implied that I mean "all (or at least most) cats".

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The "all" is pretty clearly implied there. If I say "cats love chasing mice", it's clearly implied that I mean "all (or at least most) cats".

Lol putting words in my mouth doesn't make it so. You need to brush up on your English classes. A quantifier is not required, and shouldn't be assumed. Saying "Cats love chasing mice" does not imply all cats. That is why you add the quantifier if you meant all cats!

Generally speaking if you don't have a quantifier, the hidden quantifier is a middle quantity. For example, the word "some". You would read "Cats love chasing mice" as "(some) Cats love chasing mice". You can't assume "no", "all", "most", "a few", from "Cats love chasing mice". This is because all of those quantifiers mean different quantities, and there is no way to determine which quantity the speaker is referring to. So the only logical default is in the middle. If you need clarification, you ask the speaker as to which quantity they were thinking about.

EDIT: Meant to say quantifier instead of qualifier.

[Jibartik]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]