#671
|
||||
|
Quote:
Eloian Bushlover (What's that wolf doing to that bush? OMG?!?!?!) 57 Ranger <BDA> | |||
|
#672
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#673
|
|||
|
Like I said, you guys put in the extra effort, Xp'd there for who knows how long and showed up in larger numbers when window was short. Good job and grats!
Eloian Bushlover (Bare bushes are still bushes) 57 Ranger <BDA> | ||
|
#674
|
||||
|
Quote:
Danke! | |||
|
#675
|
|||
|
guys! guys! Can we go back to negotiating now? you know, handouts, socialism, effort, second class citizens, etc? GO!
__________________
Halliel Sil'evren :: High Priestess of Unintentional Detours
Joyelle :: Jadani (not Eratani) :: Haiya :: Roban :: Aislinn :: Arcana :: Forthe:: Buymore | ||
|
#676
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Bamek Blazingbeard
| |||
|
#678
|
||||
|
Quote:
Translation: In order to move forward, all guilds should adopt the raiding strategies that sent the raid scene spiralling down the toilet in the first place. Currently, the only avenue that a guild must take in order to see a raid boss is to track through excessive spawn windows and have an army camped nearby. It has been determined by GMs and a majority of raiders that this should not be the only avenue for seeing a raid target. So other avenues must be considered. Splitting each month into a 50% rotation/50% FFA seems like a popular option for a lot of people, though it's still considered to be charity by those who are willing to spend their lives tracking it in a FFA setting. What if the Rotation in the first 15-days of the month only offered each guild a 20-minute grace period before going into FFA, rather than 8 hours (which IMO is excessive). That way, guilds aren't taking all of their rotation mobs for granted. They still have to track and mobilise as fast as usual, but they just have 20 minutes of no interruptions in order to get to their raid boss. If they wipe or fail to engage within 20 minutes, their mob becomes FFA. | |||
|
#679
|
||||
|
Quote:
The issue is both the hardcore's instant response dominance and the variance. Both of those factors are preventing lesser guilds from meaningfully participating and experiencing endgame content. Any solution needs to place restrictions on guilds that would off-hours raid and restrictions on guilds that would take a disproportionate share of mobs. Hands-off periods with a bag limit for each guild during that time is still, in my mind, the simplest and most fair.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6 | |||
Last edited by Frieza_Prexus; 01-01-2014 at 10:39 PM..
|
|
#680
|
|||
|
when will people realize you cannot split 17 mobs per week among 1,000 lvl 60s and think that all 1,000 will like the agreement?
Server casuals should be thrilled they are given one week per month to raid freely. Instead they want moar. Who wouldnt? This whole exercise in futility must be a massive troll by rogean. Dolic | ||
|
|
|