NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Toxigen]

the only mini stroke you're getting is when you jack off lying alone in bed

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, disliking the legal system isn't unique to black people. It's certainly a strain within America, and the legal system certainly is biased against all people of color, but it oppresses all of us.

Cops are actually less likely to shoot a black suspect than a white suspect under the same circumstances.

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/26/74573...minority-suspe

(and this is from npr of all places, megayikes)

[Origen]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cops are actually less likely to shoot a black suspect than a white suspect under the same circumstances.

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/26/74573...minority-suspe

(and this is from npr of all places, megayikes)

NPR is funded by the state and the actual transcript doesn't support your summary.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the only mini stroke you're getting is when you jack off lying alone in bed

Some one is mad.

But I can see why Trump makes you happy when he does it for you - since he has the mini hands you like. His hands are so small it makes you feel normal size!

look he even has the O mouth for ya [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

NPR is funded by the state and the actual transcript doesn't support your summary.

Ok fiiiiiine, here's another. I know you demand the datas:

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/fr...es_figures.pdf

TLDR: Cops are more likely to "rough up" non-white suspects, but also slightly more likely to shoot white suspects under the same circumstances.

It's a silly argument though. Yes there are obviously individual racists within the police and the court system, and that includes people who are racist against whites. Or just biased in other ways (current ridiculous trump prosecutions).

So we agree that the justice system is ripe for abuse, and is abused, but your boneheaded "they don't like the browns" argument is absurd and isn't born out by the data you pretend to care about.

[Origen]

They don't like the browns, but you misrepresent my argument and then argue against that misunderstanding, as usual.

The government employee recruitment center commonly known as Harvard is even worse than NPR. I have long maintained all ivy league schools should be bulldozed.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok fiiiiiine, here's another. I know you demand the datas:

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/fr...es_figures.pdf

TLDR: Cops are more likely to "rough up" non-white suspects, but also slightly more likely to shoot white suspects under the same circumstances.

It's a silly argument though. Yes there are obviously individual racists within the police and the court system, and that includes people who are racist against whites. Or just biased in other ways (current ridiculous trump prosecutions).

So we agree that the justice system is ripe for abuse, and is abused, but your boneheaded "they don't like the browns" argument is absurd and isn't born out by the data you pretend to care about.

Did you infer that whites were shot more?

Yeah I saw a different summary.

https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/22399.html

This paper explores racial differences in police use of force. On non-lethal uses of force, blacks and Hispanics are more than fifty percent more likely to experience some form of force in interactions with police. Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities. On the most extreme use of force – officer-involved shootings – we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account. We argue that the patterns in the data are consistent with a model in which police officers are utility maximizers, a fraction of which have a preference for discrimination, who incur relatively high expected costs of officer-involved shootings.

[arvidez]

Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My biggest worry is if the liberals don't get what they want in 2024 their children who can still walk will non stop riot and burn down enough of America to finally even turn my mom and maybe even sister into a fascist dictator.

And they're generally very passive ppl.

@Horza and Origin. Botten. If Trump gets in again. You guys need to just fucking deal with it. The amount of damage he could actually do himself is nothing compared to the damage you guys are doing and that Nancy and Kamala are doing. And every cowboy lawyer with a "constitutional grievance" instead of a rational pragmatic respectful plan.

There is nothing "radical dude" about being a moron.

Hope this helps.

the pied piper. they cant hear you over the music.

learn his song? how do you call a loved one back?

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They don't like the browns, but you misrepresent my argument and then argue against that misunderstanding, as usual.

The government employee recruitment center commonly known as Harvard is even worse than NPR. I have long maintained all ivy league schools should be bulldozed.

i made an argument and it immediately got debunked and pwned so that means I was misunderstood, not incorrect.

[Origen]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i made an argument and it immediately got debunked and pwned so that means I was misunderstood, not incorrect.

If you're gonna make up positions for your enemies to argue against, probably best in something other than a text format.