Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 03-26-2012, 05:25 PM
Marglar Marglar is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 187
Default

jesus you get 150 requests for ip excemptions weekly? that is insane.
  #52  
Old 03-26-2012, 05:52 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,188
Default

150 a week, people be lying like a mofo(the people asking for IP exemptions not AMelinda.)
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #53  
Old 03-26-2012, 05:55 PM
Cast v27.5 Cast v27.5 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 51
Default

I wonder where Destin was when most of holo got banned for supposed xploiting of naggy... beginning his nihilum experience. Were u as outraged about that incident because for the life of me i cant understand ur stance on cutting 2boxers a break with population as the backbone of ur argument.

Can u think of anything more unfair than a few ppl having the ability to box on a pvp server? Most of us from vztz pvp just the same running 1 or 2 chars, so it makes a potential kill into an impossible kill and hell id love to b able to full buff my bard for every engagement instead of just lev and jboot. Lol any impactful use of the char absolutely flips the script for pvp and perma is super fine with me until every1 can box
  #54  
Old 03-26-2012, 06:19 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

For the record I tend to agree a bit more with Cast on the boxing issue, with the caveat that I think boxing equally bad for the blue server. One big difference between blue and red is the outrageous variance on raid mobs on blue, which probably leads some people to 2-box trackers with their mains. This just isn't a problem on red (however, people on pvp servers obviously get other advantages from 2-boxing).

I think the punishment is fitting because it's difficult to enforce, so you need an even greater deterrent for it. It also gives you a massive unfair advantage and you really can't claim you didn't know it was against the rules when they always tell you it is after you request an IP exemption (and if you're using a proxy, obviously you know you're circumventing the rules). There are some ways we can help the population, but extra leniency isn't one of them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samwise
150 a week, people be lying like a mofo
Probably, but keep in mind some people have multiple accounts. I have five accounts IP exempted between me and my fiancee, because she has one account and I have access to (at least) four others.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #55  
Old 03-27-2012, 02:01 AM
Slathar Slathar is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,651
Default

Destin banned for cheating on the glorious box. Praise Amelinda for keeping our box free of cheaters, griefers, and exploiters.

GL leveling another wizard, hah.
  #56  
Old 03-27-2012, 02:09 AM
Amuk Amuk is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 821
Default

I would prefer two boxing, so I feel for Destin - but if the rule stands, and I have to pvp on a buffless rogue getting rooted like 30% with my unbuffed 120 mr, then he should be held to the punishment of taking the chance.
  #57  
Old 03-27-2012, 05:00 AM
traderbro traderbro is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 61
Default

LOL Destin banned, didnt u read the rules bud? QQ more.
  #58  
Old 03-27-2012, 08:13 AM
Amelinda Amelinda is offline
VIP / Contributor

Amelinda's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Plane of Fear
Posts: 3,672
Send a message via AIM to Amelinda Send a message via Yahoo to Amelinda
Default

I said I exempt 150 accounts. (60-75 exemptions) That his for red server AND Blue server. Some people play from a household of 3-4 people. I personally know people who play from a situation like that. Other people have lan parties at times.

I try to make people pick 2 accounts to play together (So don't put characters on different accounts. etc :P )
__________________
.
  #59  
Old 03-27-2012, 08:17 AM
kazroth kazroth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 321
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amelinda [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Remember: This is Norrath, Not Gotham. You are a player...not Batman. You DO NOT get to take the law into your own hands.
I would just like to point out... Batman wasn't allowed to take the law into his own hands, either. In fact, he started his 'crusade' because the 'law' was so corrupt. It came down to the point that somebody had to do it.

Not saying that's the case here, just thought the quote was funny! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #60  
Old 03-27-2012, 08:26 AM
Cast v27.5 Cast v27.5 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 51
Default

No wonder he came up with those ridiculous arguments, he got caught doing the ultimate nono and wanted a way out. Sorry pal no one here is stupid enough to agree with u even before knowing u got pinched.

Anyway good riddance, population -1 is fine by me given that u probably boxed a buffbot the entire time u played. Considering 2 of my 10 pvp deaths were from fighting 1v4+ u guys in guk and getting ic'd by u, im going to remove those from legimate killshots due to ur cheating. The more u know.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.