Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:06 AM
Fzhoul Fzhoul is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 20
Default

Just posting here to clear it up. Anonymous has no direct enemies (at least from our end), we have been asked to merge in with a few guilds and our stance is the same. We are prepared to stand on our own now in the current raid environment and come velious.
__________________
<Anonymous> "Guild Leader"
Hawkai - Ranger
Oteso - Wiz
Linell- Shaman
Fzhoul - Pally
  #42  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:07 AM
Rayzor84 Rayzor84 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Velious launch would go much smoother with just one "competitive" guild. Isn't that what you, Hoku, and Rogean discussed over dinner, Unbrella? TMO / Rampage merger never happened so incoming sanctions. I don't have any vested in how any of this goes anymore, but it's sad to see my old guild getting kicked while they are down. Almost makes you wanna quit, huh? Maybe that's the point.
Your old guild shouldn't have tried to get around their class restrictions.
  #43  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:10 AM
Tiggles Tiggles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,693
Default

With Forsaken suspended till velious and rampage having 2 weeks of uncontested kills I think the velious launch of blue will be interesting..


And by interesting I mean it's going to suck.
  #44  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:11 AM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

How about this, where is the correspondence from Sirken giving Forsaken approval to go nuts in class R?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They halfway thought it through, but I don't think they actually followed up with Sirken.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #45  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:11 AM
Misek84 Misek84 is offline
Aviak


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 71
Default

From the IB raid suspension page around 3/2015 (my linking skill suck)

"if i remember correctly, this has only happened one other time, and it involved TMO using Enraptured to circumvent a raid suspension. Enraptured was created by TMO and used by TMO as an alt guild prior to the suspension coming down. I also watched TMO leadership telling members to get tagged in Enraptured to circumvent punishment, and i didn't allow it. it was literally the exact same leadership and was specifically ordered to be used to avoid punishment.

this is not the case with Rampage, and so i did not treat them that way. and as i told TMO, if they want to disband their guild to form another guild, if they want to wipe dkp, if they want to shut down the TMO website, if they install new leadership, and if they did all that without knowing that the suspension was coming (to ensure it wasnt being done to circumvent me), then id be ok with it. and that was why I told Rampage that they would not be suspended.

That said, multiple staff members have reviewed this decision, and it has been decided that these punishments will still remain with any players that were IB tagged at the time of the incident, as well as any players that are currently tagged under IB.
__________________
Project1999's First Cake Giveaway! - https://youtu.be/Rx6Z_wpZAFo

Sirken's Live Stream! www.twitch.tv/sirkenp99"

So as you can see staff almost let Ramp not even serve IB suspension but end up being they had to serve the last few days (during no repop days). There were no penalty for Ramp killing mobs when they were suppose to b suspended because they were considered a new guild. But when TMO reformed to Forshaken they are considered the same guild and get a 3 week suspension (included this week deleted loot). How id that fair?
  #46  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:12 AM
Cecily Cecily is offline
Planar Protector

Cecily's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,589
Default

You can go off of Sirken's quote there and see their reasoning that they, as a new entity, would be allowed to have some autonomy in what their guild's raiding style would be like. It's just a punishment for not asking for permission and pretty shitty they weren't warned by staff beforehand.
  #47  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:15 AM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,544
Default

Wasn't Rampage formed from several guilds, though? And didn't an overwhelming majority of the current members of Foreskin come from a single entity? Seems like a difference to me.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #48  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:16 AM
Cecily Cecily is offline
Planar Protector

Cecily's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,589
Default

The vast majority of Rampage was composed of IB. I don't see a distinction there, and if you really wanna split hairs... Lord Bob merger is still fairly recent.
  #49  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:18 AM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,985
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I said 7 when it was really 5, oh, woe is me.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #50  
Old 06-10-2015, 11:24 AM
Misek84 Misek84 is offline
Aviak


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wasn't Rampage formed from several guilds, though? And didn't an overwhelming majority of the current members of Foreskin come from a single entity? Seems like a difference to me.
If you wanna argue about some minor details (85% of IB moved over while 95% of TMo moved over or whatever) go ahead. There are no specific rules what is considered a "new guild" anyways.

All im saying is it looks biased when staff is pushing for Ramp to be considered a new guild to avoid serving remainder of its sus. But when TMO reforms in same way it isnt considered a "new guild" after it kills a few mobs in R and then slapped with a very harsh penalty.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.