|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
|
Quote:
Such power. I’m sure she was absolutely crushing those fitness goals too with that kinda willpower [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
|
PG didn't bag Gwaihir. Gwaihir knowingly went into a scenario of self-sacrifice. He was killed by the state. For reasons the state keeps secret. PG was just the tool Gwaihir used to set things into motion.
| ||
|
|
Quote:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Ekco Ad'Infinitum - 60 Wizard
"I'm a wizard and that looks fucked up." - Ryan Davis. | |||
|
|
Quote:
Or how we can have evidence based anything on a disorder that’s only been around to this extent within the past decade. We have really no idea what a lifetime of copious amounts of cross sex hormones and blacking puberty does, but luckily soon we shall with this new generation of test dummies And I’m sure that when the success stories are amplified and eve tragedies buried to bowels of the internet the community can paint whatsoever narrative they want. You don’t see the people who claim to have been conned by therapists into taking drugs which ruined their lives getting invited to the White House But these are all the sorts of opinions her brain lacks the mental fortitude to willingly read. Because of “power” after all. What mental toughness | |||
|
|
Quote:
Constructive criticism is different than what we have now. We don’t seek consensus, we seek conflict. That is a mentality that will drive us into the ground if we let it. People need to pause for a second and be thankful for what they do have, which is quite a bit
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | |||
|
|
Quote:
The problem with consensus is far too many people think consensus is supposed to exist at the mean between two opposing viewpoints, but that simply isn't a tenable position in most cases. Truth is objective and if one side is closer to truth than the other, than consensus at the mean is a foolish proposition, especially when the other viewpoint is drastically further from Truth than the other. In these cases, a "compromise" of "meeting in the middle" is not an acceptable resolution to the disagreement; the party that is the furthest from Truth needs to yield to Truth and make considerably more concessions than the other party for the consensus to be an acceptable resolution to the conflict. In fact, in this example, the party furthest from Truth has an ethical obligation to make concessions and acquiesce, and if the other party is close enough to truth to be approximated as being "at truth" then nothing short of a full concession is in order for the party that is considerably further from it. Ultimately, the contemporary philosophical thought; that there is no objective truth, is the biggest reason why consensus is nigh impossible to achieve now, because accepting the premise of this statement removes the obligation to acquiesce entirely | |||
Last edited by Landroval; 04-26-2023 at 03:37 AM..
|
|
|
|