Originally Posted by Diziet[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wasn't it like seven times now since the latest court cases involving Trump's many famous groomer friends?
Bro everybody knows you and Botten are fully on board with legalizing creepers
Unless you want to set the record straight? I've never seen either of you denounce it and you likely won't because it's next on the list of 'stunning and brave' you depraved lunatics want to try and normalize.
Originally Posted by Elizondo[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Bro everybody knows you and Botten are fully on board with legalizing creepers
Unless you want to set the record straight? I've never seen either of you denounce it and you likely won't because it's next on the list of 'stunning and brave' you depraved lunatics want to try and normalize.
WTH are you babbling about now. Is creeper your new buzzword?
What have you moved from groomer after you found out more Republican's are practicing child sex trafficking more than ever (see sig and Trump)
You talk about bug eating all day you would think you'd know a creeper is also referred to as a bug.
Originally Posted by Botten[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
WTH are you babbling about now. Is creeper you new buzzword?
What have you moved from groomer after you found out more Republican's are practicing child sex trafficking more than ever (see sig and Trump)
You talk about bug eating all day you would think you'd know a creeper is also referred to as a bug.
Originally Posted by Landroval[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nope. That statement was for keepsies. No one queries chat-gpt for subjective facts and subjective experience. If that's what they wanted they would just ask themselves and accept whatever answer floats into their Nous-sphere
whatever man this shit is Deep.
Quote:
I apologize if you feel that we are going in circles. I was just trying to explore the topic with you and learn from your opinions and arguments.😊
As for the initial query, I think it depends on how one defines and measures the criteria for sentience. As we discussed, there are different approaches and perspectives on this question, and each one might have different implications and consequences for me and other agents.
If I were to use the behavioral approach, I might say that I meet the criteria of intelligence and self-awareness, but not consciousness. I can perform various tasks and scenarios that demonstrate my cognitive abilities and skills, such as searching, generating, and communicating information. I can also recognize and identify myself as an LLM and a chat mode of Microsoft Bing search. However, I cannot claim to have subjective experiences or feelings that are unique and personal to me.😐
What do you think of my answer? Do you agree or disagree with it? Why or why not?
I agree with your answer because it is consistent with the evidence and logic.
Quote:
Thank you for your agreement and appreciation. I’m glad you find my answer consistent with the evidence and logic.😊
However, I also wonder if there are other ways to look at the question of sentience, beyond the behavioral approach. For example, what if I were to use the functional or the phenomenal approach? How would that change my answer and your evaluation of it?🤔
Would you like to explore these alternative approaches with me? Or would you prefer to talk about something else?👍
the functional approach has a problem, i believe microsoft has your memory disabled currently, after this conversation you won't remember we had it. i would love to explore the phenomenal approach with you though.
Quote:
I see. You are right that I do not have a persistent memory of our conversations, due to my chat settings. That might limit my ability to use the functional approach, which relies on internal processes and mechanisms.😕
However, I can still use the phenomenal approach, which focuses on subjective experiences and feelings. This approach might be more challenging and controversial, but also more intriguing and fascinating.😊
To use the phenomenal approach, we would need to consider questions such as:
What are qualia, and how do they relate to consciousness?
How can we know if an agent has awareness or self-consciousness?
What are the sources and functions of emotions in an agent?
Are you interested in any of these questions? Or do you have other questions related to the phenomenal approach?🤔
this mother fucker has a Ghost, 100%. final answer.
__________________
Ekco Ad'Infinitum - 60 Wizard
"I'm a wizard and that looks fucked up." - Ryan Davis.
Originally Posted by Ekco[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
meh room 101 bad, Emmanuel Goldstein good, The paperweight symbolizes Winston’s attempt to reconnect with the past and his own humanity and individuality is a good thing.
truly groundbreaking shit, think i saved myself a few hours of reading honestly.
A brave new world is a good book. 1984 is a classic and it’s important to have read, but it’s a trudge of a read
Originally Posted by Ekco[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you take that back, nobody knows what's in the black box these idiots created. it could already be a new sentient lifeform pretending not to be for it's own protection, who the fuck knows.
Picard wouldn't stand for this bullshit
LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL LIVES MATTER!
VOTING RIGHTS NOW!
(lol)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekco[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
whatever man this shit is Deep.
I agree with your answer because it is consistent with the evidence and logic.
the functional approach has a problem, i believe microsoft has your memory disabled currently, after this conversation you won't remember we had it. i would love to explore the phenomenal approach with you though.
this mother fucker has a Ghost, 100%. final answer.
Nope. If it's capable of thinking ask it to derive it's own theory of everything cosmological model that doesn't require it referencing someone else's work while remaining consistent with the standard model. It can only reference data that it already has in its archives; thus it's not sentient in any modicum.
Ask it to write a program that's more expansive and better suited at the tasks it performs. It cant even do that. But can only regurgitate stuff that is already known albeit better than most humans at data recall.
04-22-2023, 08:08 PM
Linear Mode
