Originally Posted by Horza[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Can someone explain to me why drag is so dangerous if you aren't already an evangelical foaming at the mouth about how Trump was robbed like our resident GOPtards? When I was a kid, everyone I knew just thought Mrs. Doubtfire was a hilarious movie.
Mrs. Doubtfire wasn't a drag queen.
When I was a kid it was Bosom Buddies
Again, not drag and used for comedic effect rather than approval and acceptance of drag culture.
I think the issue is that masculinity is increasingly vilified in today's culture while the opposite of masculinity is praised (drag is most certainly the opposite of masculinity). It coincides with a continual declining of testosterone in males. We are losing our "manliness" and ostracizing men that show masculine traits while praising men that show non-masculine traits.
It's not good. Drag is not a cause or an effect but the sudden surge and acceptance of it is. It's been around forever - Philippe I, Duke of Orleans in the late 17th century was a crossdresser - but it wasn't like now where that behavior is praised. It wasn't accepted then but Philippe was the king's brother so he was the exception. Masculinity as defined by the time still ruled.
__________________
Last edited by MrSparkle001; 03-16-2023 at 02:47 PM..
Originally Posted by MrSparkle001[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Mrs. Doubtfire wasn't a drag queen.
When I was a kid it was Bosom Buddies
Again, not drag and used for comedic effect rather than approval and acceptance of drag culture.
I think the issue is that masculinity is increasingly vilified in today's culture while the opposite of masculinity is praised (drag is most certainly the opposite of masculinity). It coincides with a continual declining of testosterone in males. We are losing our "manliness" and ostracizing men that show masculine traits while praising men that show non-masculine traits.
It's not good. Drag is not a cause or an effect but the sudden surge and acceptance of it is. It's been around forever - Philippe I, Duke of Orleans in the late 17th century was a crossdresser - but it wasn't like now where that behavior is praised. It wasn't accepted then but Philippe was the king's brother so he was the exception. Masculinity as defined by the time still ruled.
Sorry, but all I see here is another GOPtard flailing around and desperately looking for another made up culture war issue that's going to resonate with the methheads and trailer trash like the Hillary spirit cooking nonsense did in '16.