#31
|
|||
|
Its not "communism" like americans say when referring to democrats and what not. Its not even communism in the traditional sense, anymore.
| ||
|
#32
|
|||
|
communism doesn't even mean anything anymore except as a historical term. It's been so overapplied and overstretched you're better off with a different word.
China ain't working to foment a global worker's revolution in any sense of the phrase, but rather to produce an ethnic/cultural hegemony, so I would agree it's not really communist in any meaningful way. But really it's just an authoritarian state with its own characteristics. It just is. I'd compare it to nazism first because of the emphasis on stratification and race and expansionism but it's all semantic goobergames. I'm sure we can agree it's "a little too tightly controlled" and "scary" for our tastes | ||
Last edited by imperiouskitten; 12-28-2020 at 09:19 PM..
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
some poor girl in saudi arabia that lobbied to have women drive got 6 years today lol
| ||
|
#34
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Chinese allow parallel operation of mixed market capitalism and free enterprise with major government intervention to 'guide' the economy as they see fit. Sound familiar? That's exactly what we do here in the United States, except we have different priorities and a different level of 'guidance'. China's system closely resembles how things operated in Fascist Germany-- healthy free enterprise activity, but heavy state participation in certain industries that are relevant to the state's strategic plan, and regulation of industries and activities deemed "parasitic" such as market speculation, excessive usury and the like. This is why China has been so effective both at fostering immense economic growth and luring foreign investment, while simultaneously manipulating their currency and stealing Western intellectual property for use in home-grown, state-sponsored enterprises. I think the confusion in this thread is yet another hilarious result of major deficits in US education regarding foreign countries. We got people making it to 2020 posting in this thread still thinking China is communist because no-one ever told them otherwise. lol | |||
Last edited by Lune; 12-28-2020 at 09:27 PM..
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
Ok what are they democratic socialists?
Please. | ||
|
#36
|
|||
|
state capitalists is more descriptive I guess.
words don't have meaning if you stretch them too far dear. Nothing to do with being a fan of ching chong china. Communist isn't literally a synonym for "bad strong government", it refers to specific things | ||
Last edited by imperiouskitten; 12-28-2020 at 09:32 PM..
|
|
#37
|
|||
|
In China Marxism is modified as the political ideology by the Communist Party of China to govern the party and the nation.
The important concepts of Marxism, such as the ruling class and the ruling ideas, the material labor and the mental labor, superstructure and economic base, and the ideological state apparatuses, are used by the paramount leaders of People's Republic of China to create guiding socio-political theories which make up the Chinese Marxist Philosophy. | ||
Last edited by Jibartik; 12-28-2020 at 09:35 PM..
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
now we're believing what the CCP says about itself? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
there's a lineage. there have been several soft revolutions (great leap forward etc) which fundamentally altered "the superstructure" without erasing the base of the iconography of previous regimes. This is just a semantic argument, idk why ur so triggered lmao. | ||
Last edited by imperiouskitten; 12-28-2020 at 09:37 PM..
|
|
#39
|
|||
|
Well, if the air we breathe is a conspiracy I cant win an argument that it isnt.
| ||
|
#40
|
|||||
|
Quote:
China has an entirely different governmental structure than Western states. For example, it has no parliament. It styles itself a "proletariat democracy" in contrast to Western "bourgeoisie democracy". It uses popular sovereignty as an excuse for its lapses in universal franchise, claiming that elections and parties will naturally be won by people with money, and the bourgeoisie will always be the people with money, and will thus always dominate in such a system. Quote:
| ||||
Last edited by Lune; 12-28-2020 at 09:39 PM..
|
|
|
|