Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Duik]

Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Charming a big nasty with a Cleric partner is so much nicer knowing that if charm breaks at a bad time he'll be backing you up with Stun Command, Aego, CH and if all else fails, rez.

Meanwhile with some fat fuck Shaman he's just gonna buff you with Talisman of the Jagoff and impotently spam Chloro before you both take a dirt nap.

The final sentence here is perfection. Although im sure there is more the fat fuck can do.

I want, nay need the bots to treat us like this.

[fortior]

Claiming a pocket cleric for pet CH is such a bullshit stretch. Yeah let me just pocket a shaman to malo and slow on every single pull in ST. Good grief.

[Toxigen]

500 pages here we come.

Let's put a twist on this. These hypothetical group comps start at level 1. No "HURR POCKET CLERIC" bullshit.

By the time DSM's "shaman over cleric" variant hits 60 the cleric group has been farming for weeks or months because they were able to keep uber pets rolling constantly (CH) and rez when things go tits up to keep the XP bars chugging along.

Oh and then they need to pool all their resources to buy Torpor, a spell which also slows down pet dps.

lmao

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by fortior [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Claiming a pocket cleric for pet CH is such a bullshit stretch. Yeah let me just pocket a shaman to malo and slow on every single pull in ST. Good grief.

Comparing a level 49 pocket cleric to a 60 Torpor Shaman is silly.

Let me remind you what a pocket character is, as people seem to forget in this thread for some reason:

https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4706

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh and then they need to pool all their resources to buy Torpor, a spell which also slows down pet dps.

lmao

If you have 2-3 Enchanters, you are spending a lot of money on Enchanter spells too. This is a silly argument. Torpor has also gone down a lot in price.

You don't Torpor the pets, the Shaman tanks the mob and Torpors themselves. Pets get more DPS because they are attacking from behind, and they don't take damage. Shaman can buff the pets too.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My sentiments have not changed since page 76

Troxx still cannot name a camp that needs a Cleric CHing the pet, and he is a proven troll https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=114 .

He doesn't provide evidence for his claims, yet asserts he is correct. He can't even provide log data for DPS calculations. He believes a pixelated screenshot of an excel spreadsheet is good enough evidence, but log data and videos are not.

I have provided evidence for my claims in this thread, everybody can see it if they go back into the thread and check. Trolls simply claiming all of my evidence is invalid is nothing but a troll tactic. They can't provide counter-evidence, so they try to invalidate other people's evidence by trolling. It's the only strategy they have.

[fortior]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Comparing a level 49 pocket cleric to a 60 Torpor Shaman is silly.

Let me remind you what a pocket character is, as people seem to forget in this thread for some reason:

https://project1999.com/forums/showp...postcount=4706

This is just you making up a definition that suits your conclusions and playing it off as rigid truth. There’s no reason why a 55 mage with coth can be pocketed but a 60 shaman with malo can’t. Hell I could probably 60 a shaman before 55ing a mage.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by fortior [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is just you making up a definition that suits your conclusions and playing it off as rigid truth. There’s no reason why a 55 mage with coth can be pocketed but a 60 shaman with malo can’t. Hell I could probably 60 a shaman before 55ing a mage.

I am not making up definitions. That is quite a bold statement you disagree with what a pocket character is.

There are plenty of reasons why a level 49 pocket cleric is different from a level 60 torpor Shaman:

1. Leveling from 50-60 takes as much time as leveling from 1-50. So you spent half the time leveling.

2. It costs a lot less money to level, gear, and buy spells for a pocket cleric.

3. You share the account information of a pocket character. You typically don't share your account information for a level 60 Torpor Shaman in good gear. People could cause a lot more damage to the 60 Shaman than a sparesly geared level 49 cleric if they want to steal or destroy stuff. Reimbursements take a while to get.

Pretending pocket characters are the same as main characters is silly. Anybody who has been in a guild during the past 7 years at least understands the difference. It's not a new concept, and there are a lot of pocket characters on both servers.

Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why do you have so many conflicts with so many forum users?

It's quite simple. Posters like Troxx are confirmed trolls who attack other posters who disagree with them. They are the problem, and will continue to attack other posters when I am gone. That is how bullies work. They gang up on other people to give the illusion of agreement, because they cannot win a debate normally.

[Trexller]

someone was trying to sell torp for 35k on blue yesterday

[Troxx]

I lub me some shaman but DSM is smoking crack

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I lub me some shaman but DSM is smoking crack

As you can see, Troxx cannot rebut anything, or provide counter-evidence. Thank you for conceding via trolling.

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As you can see, Troxx cannot rebut anything, or provide counter-evidence. Thank you for conceding via trolling.

Why do you have so many conflicts with so many forum users?