******Official politics thread ******

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good idea bud. Know your limitations, it's not you're fault that you're dumb. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's almost as if I have to disregard anything you say here because you can't seem to keep up. You throw out these 1 liners like "yeah and your doggie doo doo." I couldn't imagine trying to accomplish a work goal with you or even think you would contribute anything that would be beneficial. My 14 year old cousin can articulate his ideas better than you.

So if you want to add something - what is your position on impeaching Trump and what crime did he commit that violated the law? Cite the actual law and how it correlates.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Which leads to the point that yes society does decide what offends people but now we are talking about redefining what offends people based on individual circumstances and trying to make sure no one is offended (Not going to happen). People like the vocal majority for the left here declaring themselves judge of what breaks the rules for offence. No one knows any more. Is this hand motion racist? Is this mocking a retard?

The media is working on redefining definitions to those who are less likely to have the competency to understand the magnitude of "trying to make everyone happy." You don't strive for happy, you strive to be a better person, good bad or ugly. The world is unfair by nature.

In come the democratic party that all have different philosophies on what offends people. Hence the 20 candidates. The conservative platform is that since we all have different definitions of offending, we can't determine an offence until a crime has been committed. Language or signaling doesn't constitute. You may not agree with someone's behavior but until it is a crime, it is a matter of difference of opinion.

They don’t want to reason with you. They want to mock you in 10 words or less and repeatedly quote the post. Save your breath. They aren’t interested.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's almost as if I have to disregard anything you say here because you can't seem to keep up. You throw out these 1 liners like "yeah and your doggie doo doo." I couldn't imagine trying to accomplish a work goal with you or even think you would contribute anything that would be beneficial. My 14 year old cousin can articulate his ideas better than you.

If you like him so much why don't you marry him?

[Horza]

Whistle-blower is a C.I.A. officer who was detailed to the White House.

The whistle-blower who revealed that President Trump sought foreign help for his re-election and that the White House sought to cover it up is a C.I.A. officer who was detailed to work at the White House at one point, according to three people familiar with his identity.

The man has since returned to the C.I.A., the people said. Little else is known about him. His complaint made public Thursday suggested he was an analyst by training and made clear he was steeped in details of American foreign policy toward Europe, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of Ukrainian politics and at least some knowledge of the law.

[Wonkie]

Anyway impeachment isn't a criminal matter it's political

Bad president

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyway impeachment isn't a criminal matter it's political

Bad president

I thought so. Basically you are lazy. Don't want to do any research and want to rely on news organizations to do it for you. Now I understand why you vote left.

[Teppler]

Now you learn some of why Trump doesn’t rely on our intelligence community. It’s compromised. FBI, CIA and NSA should be blown up and new organizational names in their place created.

One of the biggest mistakes Trump made early on was trusting people like Comey.

Trump was losing me until this scandal. If this can lead to cleaning out the CIA, Trump will be more successful than I could ever hope for.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by BallzDeep [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I thought so. Basically you are lazy. Don't want to do any research and want to rely on news organizations to do it for you. Now I understand why you vote left.

I'm right tho. The crux of the special counsel investigation was the President cannot be charged with a crime. Ergo impeachment isn't a criminal proceeding.

Your argument is a bird.

[Horza]

The CIA is not under investigation, Trump is the one who is being impeached.

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They don’t want to reason with you. They want to mock you in 10 words or less and repeatedly quote the post. Save your breath. They aren’t interested.

I know, it is pretty typical but also kinda amusing. I'll log on a few hours to burn some down time if I'm multitasking. Half the time I believe they are trolling but then I couldn't fathom someone being that invested so I lean towards my own biases....They are probably unemployed, drug addicts, game addicts and anti-social and what would force anyone who falls under those categories to believe in self preservation, drive and opportunity for self.