Question about queers and child touchers

[Froglok]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, what is the connection between homosexuality and pedophilia?

Republicans

[Auvdar]

Originally Posted by gotrocks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're trolling, right?

If you can't see the difference between two consenting adults or even teens having sex with each other, and a 40 year old man trying to get an 8 year old to suck his dick, you have serious issues.

Going to just go with trolling, that has to be it.

And a bad troll at that. Also

inb4 "stupid faggy 2boxer hur hur" reply he will give me [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[JurisDictum]

Next thing you know a black man will want to marry a white woman.

[Grahm]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, what is the connection between homosexuality and pedophilia? I hear all sorts of unsubstantiated correlative connections made by people, and it's seriously confusing. Regardless of the the high likelihood that OP was trolling, you hear this shit all of the time.

Even liberals do this, though. I remember Thomas Roberts of MSNBC coming out, and he said, "When I was a child, I was molested by my priest, etc. etc." as though that is why he's gay. There exists plenty of pedophiles of all varieties. Let's not forget all of the insane Japanese hentai that is explicitly depicting female child abuse. Hell, that sort of animation is ILLEGAL in many countries (Canada included) because it's regarded as pedophilic.

The connection between homosexuality and pedophilia is bizarre and totally distorts the nature of sexuality into a polarity rather than a wide-spanning, healthy spectrum of appetites. Pedophilia is not included in this spectrum, just like rape/control fetish or bestiality isn't, because it is inherently victimizing and involves non-consenting parties.

PS You need to change your fucking sig Grahm. Seen that gif a million times and it destroys my browser bc hueg.

There argument is that you are born that way....why would you get crucified for it? and for your spectrum argument, not to long ago people were saying the same exact thing about homosexuals. And I literally just gave you an example of a consenting party, but would be still labeled a child molester.

You're taking my statements and making it seem like I'm suggesting 60 year old men should be able to do whatever they want with 6 year olds, which is a whole other argument. I'm saying if there is a boy/girl at 12-15 years old and a 30 year old wants to have sex with them, while both consenting, they shouldn't be crucified.

PS. no

[Grahm]

Originally Posted by Auvdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And a bad troll at that. Also

inb4 "stupid faggy 2boxer hur hur" reply he will give me [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Caught you red-handed and why I quit playing. Don't like cheaters and cheaters getting away with it after I reported it. Keep acting innocent.

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

I wonder the same thing about stockings. Here in Britain, we have come to term with stockings, and most of us are quite comfortable with them.

But a few pints or a few sherrys -- for this issue bridges class, of that I can assure you -- and we wonder and start to dispute, once you allow stockings aren't you basically approving of strangling people using uderwear?

Many a night these arguments got quite heated. Fortunately, none of us were about to risk a run in our stickings -- they are quite costly, the good ones anyway. But anyway, I see the OP's point.

[Barkingturtle]

Most stockings are darned as youngsters and that makes them the way they are.

[Malice_Mizer]

Originally Posted by Grahm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There argument is that you are born that way....why would you get crucified for it? and for your spectrum argument, not to long ago people were saying the same exact thing about homosexuals. And I literally just gave you an example of a consenting party, but would be still labeled a child molester.

You're taking my statements and making it seem like I'm suggesting 60 year old men should be able to do whatever they want with 6 year olds, which is a whole other argument. I'm saying if there is a boy/girl at 12-15 years old and a 30 year old wants to have sex with them, while both consenting, they shouldn't be crucified.

PS. no

... Ok. There is an entire legal aspect of this story. You see, the States make up "laws" that determine when a person is legally ABLE to "consent" to sexual activity with another person. A 12 year old girl, no matter what they personally have to say about the situation, cannot LEGALLY consent to sexual intercourse. Two people, no matter what crazy shit they can come up with, if they are consenting, can do whatever the hell they want sexually now that sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Pedophilia is not even in the realm of homosexuality because it, by definition, involves an individual who is legally incapable of consenting. Does this make sense?

And my entire point is that "homosexuality" is part of the spectrum of sexuality. Human sexuality is not a polar thing, where you have strictly heterosexual people and strictly homosexual people. It simply does not work that way.

[Hasbinbad]

Things pedophiles say:

Originally Posted by Grahm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm saying if there is a boy/girl at 12-15 years old and a 30 year old wants to have sex with them, while both consenting, they shouldn't be crucified.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wonder the same thing about stockings. Here in Britain, we have come to term with stockings, and most of us are quite comfortable with them.

But a few pints or a few sherrys -- for this issue bridges class, of that I can assure you -- and we wonder and start to dispute, once you allow stockings aren't you basically approving of strangling people using uderwear?

Many a night these arguments got quite heated. Fortunately, none of us were about to risk a run in our stickings -- they are quite costly, the good ones anyway. But anyway, I see the OP's point.

Nomination for best post 2013.