Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Are you happy with an 8 level pvp range
Yes 75 41.44%
No (Post your suggested level difference) 106 58.56%
Voters: 181. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #261  
Old 11-07-2011, 01:06 PM
Lovely Lovely is offline
Fire Giant

Lovely's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 828
Default

Some of us actually enjoy trying to kill a 50 in their 40's. Personally I want the gap to be as big as possible for more PVP'z
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aruden View Post
lovely is the greatest thing that ever happened to red99. watching everyone rage is hilarious.
Quote:
exploit - is the code word for they outleveled me and are now outfarming me
  #262  
Old 11-07-2011, 03:08 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Sounds like all the indoor zones that really matter are FFA anyways.
  #263  
Old 11-08-2011, 09:48 PM
hilelorangutan hilelorangutan is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovely [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Some of us actually enjoy trying to kill a 50 in their 40's. Personally I want the gap to be as big as possible for more PVP'z
I know this is the opinion of some people here, I realize this is a pvp server, but realistically your odds of doing well in a 1v1 where you are 8 levels low is terrible. In the 40s it gets better, but to do a flat 8 +/- works more AGAINST those who aren't trying to be pvp gods and kill people 8 levels above them, and opens up the floor for griefers.

If you're going to have a 8 +/- at the very least delay that until the 40s, make the 1-40 a 4 +/-
  #264  
Old 11-08-2011, 10:07 PM
Sprinkle Sprinkle is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: in a cave
Posts: 423
Default

DANG 27 pages i wonder if anyone read this

who wants to spank my ass and call me a dirty gnome?
  #265  
Old 11-08-2011, 11:01 PM
tsaC tsaC is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 368
Default

I've made this point before but no one listens.

The pvp range is far too high. It should be 4 across the boards like RZ.

Main point: I don't want to waste my fucking time fighting a level 42, I want to be fighting and competing w/ ppl with similar gear levels spells abilities. Who fucking cares about a level 42 piece of shit. Congrats if someone logs in where I'm sitting low health and kills me, maybe that will happen one time in a million. What is going to happen is every level 50 is going to stomp the shit out of low 40s for no good reason other than they are higher level etc. No one listens, no one w/ common sense. People like Lovely will post about "lol i'z wantz more pvppz" but should people like that ever get to 50 (prob wont), they want ppl around who are a lot lower so they can actually get a kill and not stomped by everyone else.
  #266  
Old 11-09-2011, 04:04 AM
oldfish oldfish is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsaC [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've made this point before but no one listens.

The pvp range is far too high. It should be 4 across the boards like RZ.

Main point: I don't want to waste my fucking time fighting a level 42, I want to be fighting and competing w/ ppl with similar gear levels spells abilities. Who fucking cares about a level 42 piece of shit. Congrats if someone logs in where I'm sitting low health and kills me, maybe that will happen one time in a million. What is going to happen is every level 50 is going to stomp the shit out of low 40s for no good reason other than they are higher level etc. No one listens, no one w/ common sense. People like Lovely will post about "lol i'z wantz more pvppz" but should people like that ever get to 50 (prob wont), they want ppl around who are a lot lower so they can actually get a kill and not stomped by everyone else.
Add xp loss to that and were in for some epic tears. Good for a couple of months and some chuckles, as for server longevity...
  #267  
Old 11-09-2011, 12:34 PM
Billbike Billbike is offline
Sarnak

Billbike's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsaC [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've made this point before but no one listens.

The pvp range is far too high. It should be 4 across the boards like RZ.

Main point: I don't want to waste my fucking time fighting a level 42, I want to be fighting and competing w/ ppl with similar gear levels spells abilities. Who fucking cares about a level 42 piece of shit. Congrats if someone logs in where I'm sitting low health and kills me, maybe that will happen one time in a million. What is going to happen is every level 50 is going to stomp the shit out of low 40s for no good reason other than they are higher level etc. No one listens, no one w/ common sense. People like Lovely will post about "lol i'z wantz more pvppz" but should people like that ever get to 50 (prob wont), they want ppl around who are a lot lower so they can actually get a kill and not stomped by everyone else.
This guy has NO idea what he is talking about.

Just stay blue and keep your ignorant theory of PVP to yourself.
__________________
Greattaste, Halfling Druid
  #268  
Old 11-09-2011, 01:23 PM
Albane Albane is offline
Sarnak

Albane's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 362
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billbike [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This guy has NO idea what he is talking about.

Just stay blue and keep your ignorant theory of PVP to yourself.
This guy has NO idea what he is talking about.


+/-4 is a good range to allow for competitive PvP. Anything higher than that just means higher level people can kill lower level people with no chance of losing.

If you are truly a PvP player and consider yourself red, then you know that all of the good PvP happens at level 50 and is against level 50 players. People who ask for no level range or a level range of 8+ are pussies who do not like competition.
  #269  
Old 11-09-2011, 01:29 PM
Vile Vile is offline
Planar Protector

Vile's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

+/-4 = win
  #270  
Old 11-09-2011, 01:48 PM
Billbike Billbike is offline
Sarnak

Billbike's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vile [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
+/-4 = win
+/- 8 =



[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyone who wants +/- 4 levels at max level is wrong.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Albane [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This guy has NO idea what he is talking about.


+/-4 is a good range to allow for competitive PvP. Anything higher than that just means higher level people can kill lower level people with no chance of losing.

If you are truly a PvP player and consider yourself red, then you know that all of the good PvP happens at level 50 and is against level 50 players. People who ask for no level range or a level range of 8+ are pussies who do not like competition.
LOL at me being a pussy for wanting MORE PVP. So when we are both 50 and I find you power leveling a 43, Im a pussy for wanting to be in range to BOTH of you? Wanting more people to fight and have more total competition makes someone a pussy?

Yall want +/- 4 cause your all scared.

I know exactly what I'm talking about.
__________________
Greattaste, Halfling Druid
Last edited by Billbike; 11-09-2011 at 05:53 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.