![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Go for that and stop quoting drivel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| |||
|
#3
|
|||||
|
for haynar, to get a bit of a better idea with some more concrete evidence:
http://www.eqclerics.org/forums/showthread.php?t=103 posted on 06-05-2000 Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
ya furor was good
__________________
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
seems like these low level MR based knockback/DD spells were almost unresistable(damage could be partial'd to hell though)
shock of lightning, shock of blades, furor, brusco's boastful bellow | ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#7
|
|||
|
What about chaotic feedback? I remember hearing that one was nearly unresistable
__________________
Impotent Rage - 59 Ranger
Hidying Imdad - 22 Cleric Yumyums Inmahtumtums - 60 Enchanter | ||
|
#8
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Those quotes are all from 2003 onward, but I believe CF had always worked this way. I played an enchanter on SZ in 2001 and never recall it being partialed either. In all the classic spdats I've viewed, the spell is parsed differently than the other enchanter nukes, as a DoT with a 1 tick duration instead of a DD, which may have something to do with that. Quote:
| ||||||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Good lord this gets compkicated.
H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
I think what's happening here Haynar is kinda like the ac/atk changes.
Get a good base down then we can find a way to deal with 1 offs? There aren't too many. For example: you nail down all the fire/cold/magic dd issues. Then we give you lists of spells by category that should behave differently and what that should be. IE: ->most issues resolved with base fix. ->We give a follow up of "these magic resist based spells should be nearly impossible to fully resist" and go from there (one off but grouped by behavior) | ||
![]() |
|
|