Get rid of /ooc

[Nirgon]

Oh wait so Nizzar does have an enchanter? How'd you know!

Lol.

You're guilty, scum.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Tr0llb0rn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please re-read your logs, and you have my permission to post this /tell where I tell you I've logged onto nizzars enchanter.

The GMs also have my permission to look and see if anyone from my city or even region of state has ever logged into Nizzars enchanter.

I knew it was a mistake to respond to you, sigh.

Read your own logs and get back to me nirgon. You are gonna owe me an apology.

He's too busy searching for invis pulling being an exploit posts, that one will take him sometime until never to complete, so gonna be hard to move onto that task.

[Nirgon]

Nope, too busy outlining some fun things to share with the pals. I'll be around again tomorrow.

[Tr0llb0rn]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh wait so Nizzar does have an enchanter? How'd you know!

Lol.

You're guilty, scum.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[heartbrand]

I like how that skorge guy proves my point about how the forums, full of mad people who don't even play on this server, are negative for generating interest in this server and should be moderated more heavily / tied to accounts / something else to cut down on it.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by NotSmedy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's the administrations fault for letting people with developer/GM access to play at the same time, shit's never EVER going to stay legit that way.

I do realize its hard finding contributors with rules not letting them play but honestly, there's people out there willing to help and doesn't give a fuck about playing, see Sirken for example, if he has a toon, it's in it's low 30th probably.

Bias is clear, it's human nature.

Still waiting for example of a change that went in that is incorrect and hence benefited Nihilum here. Will delete chars upon showing of such a change.

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Kringe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Arzak utilizing both our experience here and EQMac,
Arzak utilizing both our experience here and EQMac,
Arzak utilizing both our experience here and EQMac,

By your same notion to include Azrak's experience here as well as your own.
It has been verified on EQMAC that invis pulling mobs is indeed not classic and definitely not the way it's "supposed" to be.

So we can expect an immediate bug fix change by Azrak (Sundawg) and a full report by you or Nizzar of every mob you and him have witnessed this can be exploited by correct?



then Arzak fixed the issue literally within days

I will also be looking for this fix on invis pulling.

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is exactly how I remember it.

Fix the current invis pulling please.

o u mad?

[heartbrand]

P.S.

Originally Posted by kanras [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

NPCs will only remove PCs from feign memory on successful blur rolls, pending update. As before, Invis/Sneak/Hide will still prevent re-aggro while they're up, but once they are broken the PC is fair game.

is the last dev comment on invis pulling which seems to confirm it is considered by the devs here a legit classic technique. while many of us disagree, the devs seem to feel otherwise, so any reference to it as a bannable exploit is laughable.

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

P.S.



is the last dev comment on invis pulling which seems to confirm it is considered by the devs here a legit classic technique. while many of us disagree, the devs seem to feel otherwise, so any reference to it as a bannable exploit is laughable.

http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...9&postcount=83

[heartbrand]

So can we confirm that invis pulling, at least currently until a decision is made otherwise, is 100% acceptable on this server? That seems to be every indication.