#101
|
|||
|
Teams hardcoded. Each expansion 1 year.
| ||
|
#102
|
|||
|
Why bother trying to lobby for something we all know won't happen . Give it up
| ||
|
#103
|
|||
|
Good reverse psychology technique try hard
| ||
|
#104
|
|||
|
Still best EQ Emu PVP server out there. Speaks loads to how popular classic EQ pvp actually is = )
| ||
|
#105
|
|||
|
I think the real question is would wiping destroy the population and community? I think it would destroy some people's lives but they would bounce back.
| ||
|
#106
|
|||
|
Sirken... do the Cyclical servers man!
| ||
|
#107
|
||||
|
Quote:
QFT | |||
|
#108
|
|||
|
Each iteration of a "healthy" pvp server, be it P99 or VZTZ was always in classic/early Kunark, and always fueled by the people who could afford to play a few hours a day and still compete with their chars.
Once the socking and massive time-sink neckbeards take over, the servers get redundant and stale. It has happened 4 or 5 times now with the same results - this is just the first go-round on P99. Creating new PvP servers brings back all of the people who love classic PvP but also love real life and sunlight. Creating new servers, then eventually merging those servers into the existing PvP servers is the way to go to keep the community functioning. If you don't give the psychologically healthy people a classic PvP experience every few years, you wind up with the same problems the current population is experiencing each and every time.
__________________
Caster is not Cast
| ||
|
#109
|
|||
|
winning side will always snowball its PvP nature
it's the responsibility of the "other team" to be appealing and successful enough to attract and retain players sore losers | ||
|
#110
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|