It just keeps getting worse

[Duik]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is there a rule against tormenting other users for fun?

If that's the rule, I'm fucked.
Also Reiwa, why do you always ask such dumbarse questions?

Have a nice day!

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If that's the rule, I'm fucked.
Also Reiwa, why do you always ask such dumbarse questions?

Have a nice day!

Lol, Reiwa is the type of person who has an inflated view of their own intelligence. They think they are smart and thus they think they are asking these "gotcha" type questions, when in reality everyone is just looking at them like "what????"

[loramin]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol, Reiwa is the type of person who has an inflated view of their own intelligence. They think they are smart and thus they think they are asking these "gotcha" type questions, when in reality everyone is just looking at them like "what????"

Seriously!!!

I just have to share this recent exchange from his gluten thread. He had changed the topic from Celiac's to corn subsidies, and I responded with:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Without the subsidies, we wouldn't have (or at least we'd have a lot less) "corn addiction".

The main (though certainly not the only) effect of all those subsidies is to make corn cheaper. People consume cheap things more than they consume expensive things, and so they consume more corn when its price is artificially low.

He responded with three completely nonsensical questions (but only two question marks):

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What about when the corn addicts vote for someone to take away their corn subsidies?

Is that illegitimate?

What's the problem.

I was confused:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Huh?

He explained that not only had he stopped talking about people with Celiac's, or people at all ... or even corn subsidies! No, he was worried about the corn itself:

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The corn addicts are being provided with corn at a subsidized price.

The majority of all corn addicts vote to end the corn subsidization.

What should happen to the corn?

I tried to answer reasonably, but (like you) I noted that his questions were ... peculiar:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People should eat it, and then not grow so much corn? Same thing that should happen if anyone votes to end the subsidies.

You sure have some odd questions.

But now here's my favorite part of this whole thing ... his response was (essentially) to accuse me of corrupting the conversation, because I couldn't understand his mad ramblings!

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a popular meme right now.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How out of touch with reality do you have to be to spend your time asking questions about what happens to hypothetical corn in a hypothetical future scenario ... and then when someone (politely) asks you "WTF?", you telll them that you see them as a political enemy, who is just pretending not to understand your corn fixation (so they can disrupt an oh-so-important Off Topic conversation)!

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seriously!!!

I just have to share this recent exchange from his gluten thread. He had changed the topic from Celiac's to corn subsidies, and I responded with:


He responded with three completely nonsensical questions (but only two question marks):


I was confused:


He explained that not only had he stopped talking about people with Celiac's, or people at all ... or even corn subsidies! No, he was worried about the corn itself:


I tried to answer reasonably, but (like you) I noted that his questions were ... peculiar:


But now here's my favorite part of this whole thing ... his response was (essentially) to accuse me of corrupting the conversation, because I couldn't understand his mad ramblings!


How out of touch with reality do you have to be to spend your time asking questions about what happens to hypothetical corn in a hypothetical future scenario ... and then when someone (politely) asks you "WTF?", you telll them that you see them as a political enemy, who is just pretending not to understand your corn fixation (so they can disrupt an oh-so-important Off Topic conversation)!

Are you tattling on me for disrupting an important Off Topic conversation?

It looks like you're tattling.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seriously!!!

I just have to share this recent exchange from his gluten thread. He had changed the topic from Celiac's to corn subsidies, and I responded with:


He responded with three completely nonsensical questions (but only two question marks):


I was confused:


He explained that not only had he stopped talking about people with Celiac's, or people at all ... or even corn subsidies! No, he was worried about the corn itself:


I tried to answer reasonably, but (like you) I noted that his questions were ... peculiar:


But now here's my favorite part of this whole thing ... his response was (essentially) to accuse me of corrupting the conversation, because I couldn't understand his mad ramblings!


How out of touch with reality do you have to be to spend your time asking questions about what happens to hypothetical corn in a hypothetical future scenario ... and then when someone (politely) asks you "WTF?", you telll them that you see them as a political enemy, who is just pretending not to understand your corn fixation (so they can disrupt an oh-so-important Off Topic conversation)!

Yeah I legitimately think he has some degree of autism or some other disorder. Not intending that as an insult, he just operates that way.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah I legitimately think he has some degree of autism or some other disorder. Not intending that as an insult, he just operates that way.

That is an insult. And you have zero convictions.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is an insult.

So you're saying being autistic is bad? Sounds like you're the one who is turning autism into an insult.

I don't think being autistic is an insult at all. It's a condition. Doesn't make someone a bad person.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you're saying being autistic is bad? Sounds like you're the one who is turning autism into an insult.

I don't think being autistic is an insult at all. It's a condition. Doesn't make someone a bad person.

You wouldn't have said it in that context if you didn't mean it to be an insult.

You're like an old southern women with your backhanded coded insults sipping your mint julips and being l ike, "yall i didn't say nunthin of the sort"

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol, Reiwa is the type of person who has an inflated view of their own intelligence. They think they are smart and thus they think they are asking these "gotcha" type questions, when in reality everyone is just looking at them like "what????"

As long as you back off from him. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As long as you back off from him. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Great example of the point I was making lol