#41
|
|||
|
I dont know how to say this, but this investigation, it's just people abusing their power to help push their political message.
It's conspiracy with a lot of media, angry people in power, and ultra wealthy people that control all this shit. This is a perfect example of partisan identity politics, completely flying over the 3 branches of government, just to help drum up public support during their elections. Everyone on all sides admits there will be no arrests, no trails, no jail. This just a public theater designed to help convince voters to vote for the "good guys" | ||
#42
|
||||
|
Quote:
Whether they specifically get Trump, a little tough to predict right this second. But I think some of the inner circle will go down. | |||
#43
|
|||
|
Saying that arrests will be made because of a witch hunt is like saying that maybe 1 witch out of 10 of the virgins that couldn't swim makes it worth it.
And your proof she even is a witch was hearsay anyway. | ||
#44
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
f1=Q#
| |||
#45
|
|||
|
They can't win. They are just insulating themselves with an angry mob.
| ||
#46
|
||||
|
Quote:
Most of what's come out in the hearings is either not hearsay or falls within an exemption. But again, understandable that some people wouldn't understand that since if you're not a lawyer it's not something you would ever be well versed in and the hearsay/evidence rules are pretty complex. | |||
#47
|
|||
|
I bet there is a 1:1 correlation with people who voted for Biden in 2020 and people who think this trial is not a witchunt.
Anyone here who is a vocal OT poster that can assure us that they voted for trump in 2020 but feel they were bamboozled now and want him in jail based off what you saw on the news? | ||
#49
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not sure how to respond to your second paragraph because it's kind of nonsensical. | |||
#50
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Does not provide any, but then comes back to re-state this exemptions BS. Quote:
Pick a number. Any number. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803 Narrator: Seedy, actually read through the law for once. What he could understand, he realized did not apply in this case. Will he admit CNN lied to him, or will he admit the lady's testimony was hearsay? Stay tuned.
__________________
| ||||
Last edited by Castle2.0; 07-07-2022 at 01:20 PM..
|
|
|