Einstein or Newton

[Chaboo_Cleric]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

looks like someone is in a Survey of Science course at his local community college

Pretty accurate. Physics, but close. One more year till I transfer to UCSD. Tuition cost estimate 23,000 a year. Thank god I sold my home ��

[fash]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My man, Isaac Newton

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by fash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My man, Isaac Newton

This. Newton possessed that sacred knowledge that you read about in some of the parallel literature written around the time that the Torah was thought to be conceptualized. (The pre-edited Torah so to speak, referenced sacred knowledge sharing and associated god directly with knowledge and science).

There was a very early sect of Judaism that believed god needed men as their partners on Earth, and that is why he gave us these "woke" individuals to bless us with dramatic advancements in our understanding.

Egypt had electricity and batteries (as did Iraq/Baghdad, they found a battery there as well).

Anyway little tangent. Newton was on another level of analysis.

I will not overcredit (((Einstein))) most of his history has been smudged in his favor. As tends to happen when shekels control the education system, publishing (book publishes need bankroll you know?) etc. ITT morons don't know how the monetary system works. Businesses (books, TV, universities) needs shekels + Jews created shekels + Jews provide shekels = Lune's post about Einstein.

^ Theory of Relativity adapted to 2016.

*edited to size 4, as I felt the woke-factor called for it.

[myriverse]

Einstein, because he came later.

[entruil]

Were they both preterists? if not then i choose newton...

[Chaboo_Cleric]

Newton is basically Jesus

[Borak]

Newton was the last famous person who still believed in alchemy. Eh, why support a quack.

Einstein didn't have time for fantasies. Quote: 'It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.'

Einstein is the man.

[Nibblewitz]

Originally Posted by Borak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Einstein is the man.

He also convinced the U.S Government to build the atomic bomb by telling them the Nazis were working on one.

What a guy!

[Chaboo_Cleric]

Originally Posted by Nibblewitz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He also convinced the U.S Government to build the atomic bomb by telling them the Nazis were working on one.

What a guy!

Yeah. It's kind of a good thing he did though , just sayin.

[Loke]

Originally Posted by Borak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Newton was the last famous person who still believed in alchemy. Eh, why support a quack.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_transmutation

For those of you who won't actually read this, nuclear transmutation could be considered modern day alchemy. In 1980 a professor at UC Berkeley actually turned atoms of bismuth into gold, which was one of the original aims of alchemy (albeit at a loss). I don't know if I'd consider a guy a quack for believing something was possible just because the technology to actually do it wouldn't exist for a couple hundred years.