Best one sentence summation of how I feel, ever.

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Of course it necessitates a God. Only consciousness can create things. The big bang itself can't be the cause. Someone would have to trigger it just like a gun won't ever fire if nobody is there to pull it's trigger. Consciousness is the only possible logical cause for existence. Even if you were to suggest the cycle of the big bang were infinite, the first one would still had to have been caused by a conscious being.

Also, it doesn't matter how many religions there have been, there is still only one true God. The "gods" of ancient times aren't the same as God as they to are the children of the same one true God. All of the so called "gods" are the fallen angels and the Nephilim offspring they produced, they weren't actually made up characters but beings that actually existed and walked the Earth. However, Jesus proved his father is the one true God when he was raised from the dead as well as a plethora of other miracles.

Aside from the Bible there is also plenty of scientific proof that God exists the best of which is the discovery of DNA. Only a conscious being of unimaginable intelligence could create something such as DNA which is really just an ultra complex biomechanical computer capable of creating living organisms. It's written in a specific chemical language with it's own alphabet. At some point someone would have had to define this alphabet as inanimate matter is incapable of doing so.

You wouldn't go to some ancient temple, see a bunch of hieroglyph's and think "hmm cool natural formation!". No, it's obvious that someone created it. The only difference between those hieroglyph's and DNA is that DNA is much smaller and harder to see and far more advanced.

cute. I especially liked how you said a causal sequence requires a conscious origin, and expected us to not see the hole in your reasoning. Conscious causality requires a conscious cause, naturally. But you didn't prove the cosmos as a consciously caused thing. So, you know, fail.

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by Sidelle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol. Do I even wanna know what a Millie is? Shit.....

Oh its just a reference to a guy who pretends to be a girl and makes long elaborate cons to keep the Lie afloat.

Created by EQ and ran to perfection by a dude in FOH for quite a few years. Unfortunately he dun goofed by pretending to be some gamer chick who got a tiny bit famous for going to cons.



BOOM your mind is full eq history dawg.

Look i really do not know you are a girl or not. But you have the forum presence of a guy. You have either been seasoned by the salty dogs that sail among the sea's of shitty gaming forums, or a dude.


It interests me.


MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

cute. I especially liked how you said a causal sequence requires a conscious origin, and expected us to not see the hole in your reasoning. Conscious causality requires a conscious cause, naturally. But you didn't prove the cosmos as a consciously caused thing. So, you know, fail.

There is no hole in my reasoning at all. Something which at one point didn't exist, had to be created. The Universe at one point didn't exist, therefor it had to be created. Creation can only be caused by a conscious being. Therefor the cosmos is the result of a conscious act of creation.

[Ahldagor]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ahldagor]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Abner]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ignorant creationists who believe that abiogenesis somehow debunks evolutionary science are annoying and frustrating. I'm done responding to the trolls in this thread.

I have said nothing about creationism. I said Darwinian Evolution is a religion. And by the way, calling creationists ignorant shows your own lack of knowledge. There are many creationist scientists today and throughout history.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Abner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have said nothing about creationism. I said Darwinian Evolution is a religion. And by the way, calling creationists ignorant shows your own lack of knowledge. There are many creationist scientists today and throughout history.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHbYJfwFgOU
Bill Nye said it best.

[Gaffin']

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Which one?

All of them

[Recycled Children]

Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just like catching your parents placing gifts from Santa under the tree does not disprove your theory of Santa's existence. Nor does it disprove the theory that Santa delivered the presents in previous years and will deliver them in years to come. Obviously the theory holds up despite that one minor inconvenience.

At this point the strongest argument I can find against evolution is the fact that Illusionz is supposedly one of the products of it.

What? Do you understand know what the theory of evolution is? Evolution is the origin of species not the origin of life you dumb militant atheist piece of shit.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Recycled Children [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What? Do you understand know what the theory of evolution is? Evolution is the origin of species not the origin of life you dumb militant atheist piece of shit.

Shh, don't tell them. It's amusing watching them make asses of themselves screaming about Abiogenesis over and over again.