SOE now selling PLAT for RL money!

[Tenpin]

sooo sad to hear this

[Dantes]

I never understood the desire to pay real money for getting ahead in a game. It's like a sicker version of cheating. Makes me want to call up SOE and ask them "How do you sleep at night???" Despicable.

[mitic]

Originally Posted by Dantes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never understood the desire to pay real money for getting ahead in a game.

whats not understandable by doing this? usualy if someone fails in life, he tries to be the tough guy on the nets

[BuzWeaver]

Originally Posted by Dantes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never understood the desire to pay real money for getting ahead in a game. It's like a sicker version of cheating. Makes me want to call up SOE and ask them "How do you sleep at night???" Despicable.

This is what separates us on the EMU from the "New Gen" players. For them its all about the instant gratification. Sadly, SOE is now enhancing this enabling behavior. I suppose for them its another way to generate cash, you have to applaud their marketing team for studying their metrics/demographics.

[BuzWeaver]

From the Ten Ton Hammer News Letter today:


The next tidbit of news comes from Sony Online Entertainment and its flagship MMOG, EverQuest II. SOE has opted to acknowledge that people might long to play EQ2, but…not enough to pay a $15 monthly subscription. They’re offering veterans with currently closed accounts a sort of subscription microtransaction called the EverQuest II Passport--a payment of $5 buys you 3 consecutive days of gameplay in a 30 day period.

Good idea? Maybe. To me, $5 for 3 days doesn’t seem like much of a deal when I can buy a whole month for $15. And yet, the option might appeal to my husband who has recently expressed an interest in playing EQ2 with me again but can barely find time to squeeze in a few hours of the game, let alone a month’s worth. With SOE's new pricing plan, he could pay $5 for what amounts to a weekend pass and join me for some adventuring in Norrath. Since he works 10 hour days and attends college 3 nights per week, one weekend is probably all he can spare, anyhow.

There are other solid reasons why the EQ2 Passport might make sense to some people. It would be a great boon for multi-boxers who don’t want to maintain multiple 30-day subscriptions but do want the occasional advantage of rolling up an alt-bot to support their main. It’s also a good way to take advantage of seasonal events, if they appeal to you, or for /claiming login bonus items. But…

On an internal Ten Ton Hammer news discussion email, Jay “Medeor” Johnson commented that he felt SOE had made an interesting move, but that the new pricing option had too many constraints. He proposed that a number of non-consecutive hours for the $5 fee might be a better approach. I have to agree that I’d be more tempted to play if I had X hours to kill at my leisure than if I had to burn a weekend (or any other 3 days straight) to get my money’s worth. Who knows why SOE didn’t do it that way. Perhaps it’s much easier technically to flag an account by the consecutive day than by hours played. Or maybe a passport by the hour didn’t make monetary sense.

Still, it’s encouraging to see SOE thinking outside the $15 per month subscription box most AAA MMOGs find themselves in. I’ve played a few MMOGs in my day that left me thinking, “I enjoy this, but I don’t play often enough to justify a monthly subscription.” I’m not sure SOE’s found the right answer to dilemmas like mine, but it does my heart good to know that at least one AAA developer is searching for them.

[nicemace]

personally i dont know why they didnt do it sooner, the only way you can combat the market of selling shit for irl cash is if you can control that market.

they never did anything to people who were selling shit.

i ended up making around 10 - 12k IRL cash over my 9 years of live.

as for the service of the npcs, meh they couldnt do anywhere near what i did with my 5 box power lvling so dosent bother me.

[FatMagic]

Originally Posted by BuzWeaver [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On an internal Ten Ton Hammer news discussion email, Jay “Medeor” Johnson commented that he felt SOE had made an interesting move, but that the new pricing option had too many constraints. He proposed that a number of non-consecutive hours for the $5 fee might be a better approach. I have to agree that I’d be more tempted to play if I had X hours to kill at my leisure than if I had to burn a weekend (or any other 3 days straight) to get my money’s worth. Who knows why SOE didn’t do it that way. Perhaps it’s much easier technically to flag an account by the consecutive day than by hours played. Or maybe a passport by the hour didn’t make monetary sense.

Still, it’s encouraging to see SOE thinking outside the $15 per month subscription box most AAA MMOGs find themselves in. I’ve played a few MMOGs in my day that left me thinking, “I enjoy this, but I don’t play often enough to justify a monthly subscription.” I’m not sure SOE’s found the right answer to dilemmas like mine, but it does my heart good to know that at least one AAA developer is searching for them.

I agree 100% with this. If they did a $5 for say 72 hours of playtime, anytime you want - I would totally do it. I never play more than this of any single game in a month. And I would be extremely happy to pay $5 instead of $15 for my amount of playtime.

I'm also glad to see they are doing stuff like this, as I am more casual than hardcore. And like I said previously, I don't play more than 72 hours of gaming in a month (I probably do more like 40-50 hours MAX in a month). So this is a great option for me. WHich is why I've found I enjoy Free-To-Play games with micro-transactions.

[Omnimorph]

Originally Posted by FatMagic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I agree 100% with this. If they did a $5 for say 72 hours of playtime, anytime you want - I would totally do it. I never play more than this of any single game in a month. And I would be extremely happy to pay $5 instead of $15 for my amount of playtime.

I'm also glad to see they are doing stuff like this, as I am more casual than hardcore. And like I said previously, I don't play more than 72 hours of gaming in a month (I probably do more like 40-50 hours MAX in a month). So this is a great option for me. WHich is why I've found I enjoy Free-To-Play games with micro-transactions.

You make a good point, but it's also a bad point. You play a max of 50 hours. That's more than most people play in a month i bet, so why would they want to lose $15 a month by giving you your playtime for $5.

They'd be wiser to check to see their current player base, and the majority of play times, and then maybe have the pass cover 60% of the lower amount of play times, that way ensuring the current player base keep paying the $15 rather than opting for the $5.