Quote:
Originally Posted by Duik
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I did link a post of you saying exactly that above.
Remember that one?
Better than mage cuz shm can solo 4 - 5 while everyone else groups.
Many many posts exactly like this one.
Anywho. Id defo take a wiz or druid or virtually any other class if you was the shm who turned up.
|
Please show where my quote says "the usefulness of a shm over virtually any other class is the ability to solo off to the side while everyone else plays together".
I don't see it anywhere here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'd still swap the cleric for a Shaman in this kind of group. You get more classes that can split off and solo when there are no priority targets up. Cleric has to stay stuck to the Ench or Necro. You can always use a pocket cleric for the rare fight that might need to CH the pet.
|
You are taking what I said out of context and changing the wording (which changes the meaning) to troll me, as usual. I said "in this kind of group", because the context of that post is responding to Fortior's specific discussion about a Wizard focused group that can teleport around and split up to kill more targets. The whole idea of Fortior's Wizard group is you have multiple people soloing/duoing to kill more targets. I never made the split group suggestion. I am just replying to Fortior's discussion about a Wizard focused group that splits up to kill more targets.
The problem is you don't read threads, and make up lies about what other people say because you don't understand what is being discussed.