An open letter to GM staff regarding MQs

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

If these transactions are problematic, simply require a third party to be a disinterested party in case of any beefs, and who also would be willing to vouch for the buyer/seller, ie, willing to take a ban and/or reimbursement if scammery is afoot.

So each party may require a "second," as in dueling. The second would have to be someone willing to put their own ass/bank on the /log for the transacting party.

Any reputable trader and mq'er should have zero difficulty obtaining such a second, and I am sure by the time an account is thinking of buying a mq, they should have someone trustworthy and accountable too.

This would allow for very easy csr, since the second is agreeing to be the "account of record" as it were, and so has already agreed up front to bear any penalties should something go awry.

Naturally, the second, being in such a clearly delicate position, should get a modest fee for this service rendered, a percentage of the total transaction, say, 20% per transaction total, from each party. Vouchin' ain't easy.

Solved
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]