Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Under that logic a Burger King employee, who was otherwise 100% perfect, could blow up the McDonald's across the street and BK would be liable. That is simply not the case barring BK's negligence, ratification, or something similar attaching liability.
|
Sorry, I should have been more specific. They are liable for intentional torts reasonably related to job (I don't think it's in the scope of employment).
Your right a a bar will be liable for a bouncer's battery but not them blowing up rival bar.
I'm arguing that a monks training another group is common and reasonably expected.
06-18-2014, 06:02 PM
Threaded Mode