Dear Atheist,

[Orruar]

Root, do you get at all concerned when you make about 20 posts and nobody responds to any of them? Does that not tip you off that what you're saying is of no interest to anyone at all?

[r00t]

Besides the fact that people do, hence over 100 replies in this thread copy pasted off some christian website

[kylok]

Oh and it is absolutely possible to calculate the entropy of DNA - my O chem professor figured it out in 6 months, just waiting on publishing.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Besides the fact that people do, hence over 100 replies in this thread copy pasted off some christian website

Yeah, you're good at starting conversations. Not so good at seeing them through to completion.

[r00t]

Originally Posted by kylok [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

r00t just stop, you're spouting old ass rhetoric that has generally proven to be false, if you want me to line by line it I will but you can use Google as well as the next ape.

quite on the contrary, there is more evidence that we are living in a computer simulation than there is evidence in the broken ass fossil record for evolution, yet you have no trouble believing everything spoonfed to you in school. Some of the more interesting parts of the theory are that quantum physicists have discovered particles use the same crc32 checksum ias nvented by a computer scientist in the 1960s. The speed of light being the maximum speed of the CPU. I could go on, but maybe you should try as your suggestion states and Google this very fascinating stuff.

[kylok]

And I'm being made physically sick by the rampant misuse of the word theory

A theory is not the same as a hypothesis. A theory provides an explanatory framework for some observation, and from the assumptions of the explanation follows a number of possible hypotheses that can be tested in order to provide support for, or challenge, the theory.

[r00t]

Who is misusing the word theory and causing the confusion, besides evolutionists

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Boggwin Bramblefoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok, one last one, then I will be off. So your argument for evolution, and against God is a photo of a family with Achondroplasia? That is your argument, and you say I am coming from a place of uneducated opinions? That means nothing. You might as well have put up a photo of a pencil or a phone. What does that even mean? I have an idea, but I want you to put together an intelligent thought and convey it here, for us to see. This thought needs to come from a place of "educated opinions". You, my friend, are embarrassing. Later all!

You must not be a very good nurse. Surely you've learned about antibiotic resistant bacteria in hospitals, like MRSA?. And you don't even know how they got to be that way? I'll give you a hint: God didn't make them resistant to beta lactam antibiotics.

[r00t]

bacteria turning into more bacteria is proof that god doesnt exist

[kylok]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

quite on the contrary, there is more evidence that we are living in a computer simulation than there is evidence in the broken ass fossil record for evolution, yet you have no trouble believing everything spoonfed to you in school. Some of the more interesting parts of the theory are that quantum physicists have discovered particles use the same crc32 checksum ias nvented by a computer scientist in the 1960s. The speed of light being the maximum speed of the CPU. I could go on, but maybe you should try as your suggestion states and Google this very fascinating stuff.

I would absolutely love to read this supposed evidence. Everything you just stated is correlation not causation. Coincidence =/= Divinity. The speed of light is the maximum speed of everything, from the prospective of a photon travel is instantaneous (try and reconcile that with human perspective). Quantum physics doesn't discover particles, particle physicists do that - and furthermore in the field of QM nothing is directly observed as it changes the results. Nice try and I didn't even have to google for that.