![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() Personally I compare:
newb weapons to a dwarven axe 6/26 high end fast weapons to a lammy 9/19 bracer ac to a banded bracer, 6ac chest pieces to banded mail, 15ac mid-speed 1h weaps to centi long sword 14/27 (why is silken whip so fucking cheap?) crystalline short sword/centi short sword for other high endish 1hs 12/24 what about you guys? | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() I dont really have items that I use as a baseline.
For weapons I have 1/2 ratio in my mind in kunark era and in classic era it was 1/3. For other items I pretty much compare to whatever I have I guess. | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() The numbers pretty much speak for themselves; I don't really use other items as a comparison.
I'd guess the reason silk whip is so cheap is it's rng/war only, and warriors have tons of better available weapons that are faster. | ||
|
#4
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() Rarity, desirability pretty much determine price. Divide attack by delay to get a baseline of how good something is. Lammy is midgrade at best. It's worse than .5 ratio, so kinda bad. But pretty nice compared to a .23 Dwarven axe. High end 1 hand weapons are around .55+, with .6+ being end game atm.
| ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() | ||
|
![]() |
|
|