Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriam1066
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That decision shouldn’t be in the hands of a 13 year old. We don’t let kids drive until they’re 16 or vote until they’re 18. I strongly disagree with you on this as a father of three. Children do not understand permanence yet even though they’re allegedly adolescents. They take risks, are struggling to find themselves, etc
You have to AT LEAST wait until they’re 18 to determine that man, that isn’t being a bigot (I don’t think)
|
It isn't, it's always involved parents consenting. Why should we outlaw the
option?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topgunben
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
At the very least 18. Only a total piece of shit would castrate their son, or pump testosterone into their daughter because of social pressures.
|
Not seeing any facts, just opinions. Why are you avoiding the direct question? Explain why the state should remove the choice to consent on behalf of their child with facts.