Quote:
Originally Posted by rivalxl
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you do the math we are both wrong. The pet in your provided screen shots has a 22% reduction of its normal damage not 10-15%. Maybe you should do the math on your own argument and not waste time with bad information.
|
Again, think before you hit reply or quote.
You are assuming that the pet is the highest level pet. Which we do not know.
You also forget about AC mitigation on a ranger that is very well geared.
I also did not say that the hit for 37 was, in fact, 10-15% reduction.
I said that 10-15% reduction better describes 'slightly reduced' than your 40%.
There simply aren't enough facts to know what the reduction is, but it sure as hell wasn't 50% or 40%.
There aren't enough pet hits. We don't know what level pet it was. We don't know what the stats on the ranger were.