Quote:
Originally Posted by Trexller
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
don't need a search engine to understand that jackin up a young girl on testosterone is gonna fuck her up
but thats what you want, so obv you wouldn't see a problem with it.
|
That wasn't the nature of my criticism. I don't have kids. I want to know why we think the state needs to be involved in "preventing" this sort of "harm", while we ignore other things that are legal for parents to do that cause more harm.
Why this one specific issue? It's incredibly unlikely, and sets a terrible precedent that a just supreme court would invalidate, if we had one.