Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The argument is that the purposeful movements of a fetus demonstrates a minimum level of sentience which entitles it to protection as a human being.
Babies jacking it is merely an example to illustrate the larger concept. It's bizarre only to those who don't grasp what the example implies.
|
I wouldn't use the word 'bizarre' I'd use the word 'misleading' instead.
The entire argument is a crock of crap and anyone who is ignorant enough to fall for it should never come back out the next time they go to church.
Middle-school level biology you learn that even single celled organisms respond to basic stimuli.