Quote:
Originally Posted by TarukShmaruk
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rangers have dual wield - exactly how bad is their dps in say, vanilla EQ, compared to other classes?
|
monks and rogues have dual wield but also have special attacks. rogues have backstabs and monks have all of their different types of kicks and punches, both of which can be a substantial increase to DPS.
rangers just have simple 5 damage kicks, and they cap lower than warriors or monks.
so you could say that the ranger DPS is equal to the rogue DPS if you removed backstab or the monk dps if he didn't have his kicks or punches.
(bards also have dual wield, but never learn double attack)
so in all, ranger DPS would be very similar to warrior DPS, which is unfortunate considering warriors are not a DPS class.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TarukShmaruk
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I mean a couple of ykeshas and I'm pretty sure they do more sustained dps than wizards
|
those are tank weapons because they proc a DD+stun. i do not believe rangers would out DPS a wizard with C2 by just twinking proc aggro weapons. he definitely wouldn't live longer.