of your 4 links, 1 is an opinion article and 3 are studies that show circumcision is either the same as uncircumcised or in some circumstances better
study 1: better if circumcised before age 12, same otherwise, no negative
study 2: better for HIV, modestly better for STIs, no negative
study 3: same for acquisition of HPV, better for spread of HPV amongst genital sites, no negative
and that's your idea of rebuttal. there are far more positive studies that show more significant benefits. but even your studies show it's either the same or mildly better to be circumcised.
|