View Single Post
  #2  
Old 06-06-2013, 03:00 AM
Kagatob Kagatob is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
by the way, you're totally ignoring the plethora of studies that say circumcision decreases risk of HIV, oncogenic types of HPV, HSV-2, penile cancer, cervical cancer in hetero partners, phimosis, balanitis, and UTIs. randomized controlled trials show no clinically significant difference in sexual satisfaction or function between circumcised/uncircumcised.

depending on society, there can also be vast differences in aesthetic preference among sexual partners

complication rate is exceptionally low, and risks are very minor

basically, it's a minor elective procedure with a handful of mildly beneficial effects and very few risks. the only reason to get worked up about it is if you're an uninformed bigot, which you are.
Your posting history only shows that your bias is anything but medical. I suggest you reflect on all of the garbage that you've been posting when it's been pointed out multiple times your sources are biased for a plethora of reasons. Particularly noteworthy when you resort to invoking for how it's an "aesthetic preference depending upon society".
If I cared what newborn-dick-sucking primitives cared about I'd be in a whole heap of trouble.