Quote:
Originally Posted by Ele
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Depends on the arson statute and what level of culpability is required. It is usually separated by degrees of arson based on property value or death/injury to person.
Speaking of your example, your actor would lack "intent" but likely acted knowingly or recklessly.
Not to drag this out further with semantics, but the original point was "intentional" training requires "intent" to train.
|
There's a difference : that might not have been intentional training as in "training with the purpose of training." but rather: not giving a single fuck that you might very well train someone by trying to achieve your goal. The goal in question here being Inny being pulled to zone.
So sure its not as despicable as intentionally training for the sake of trainning, but its still a jackass move nevertheless.