Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadwen
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Human, and Mith Marr is the only real god for paladins.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faerie Blossom
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faerie Blossom
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What is the definition of paladin, then?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stinkum
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The Mithaniel Marr description.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faerie Blossom
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I feel like we're going in circles, somehow...
|
inb4 LOLRPER
I won't argue that Human should be the only race capable of being Paladins, that's another topic altogether (not to mention rolling a 17+ charisma with your sixth 3d6 roll) - but
Paladins are Lawful in regards to the 'Society' aspect; They are bound to respect,follow,honor the Laws of a land and follow the protocol. They can only question them when they deem they are directly opposed to their morals or sense of fairness towards the people (or their own religion). They are also 'Good' when it comes to how they treat other forms of life (intelligent or not), again obeying a morality and ethics code that is in direct contrast with nature.
Nature on the other hand is never governed by such fair laws. The weak get culled; Always food for the strong. Natural selection. Nature is neutral in every sense - even her devoted 'protectors' are either True Neutral, Neutral Good, Chaotic Good, or even Chaotic Neutral (druids & rangers).
Paladins would never side with that aspect of Nature. Why?
Simple as this -
Disorder leads to spiritual weakness.
Spiritual weakness leads to evil.
And evil will not be tolerated.