[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

First of all, it must be noted that the fossil record is for the most part incomplete. While it is true that there are some fossils that seem to indicate a gradual increase in sophistication and complexity of species over a long period of time, there are so many major gaps, it is impossible to use the fossil record as evidence.

I addressed this clearly.

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mutations do occur. There is no dispute about that. But how do mutations account for the changes that take place from one species to another? In fact, genetic mutations and natural selection cannot begin to explain how even one, single protein or biological process could have "evolved".

Mutations occur within an individual, thus do not occur "between species."

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The "Theory of Evolution" states that small, gradual changes in the genetic code sometimes resulted in a beneficial adaptation for an organism of a particular species, and
since it now lived a little longer or a little better, it naturally would have more offspring, and its new and improved genes get passed along.

Mutations most often confer no benefit or harm, but rather become sections that simply aren't expressed or are expressed in a way that does not cause harm to the organism. Only in very rare cases are mutations either catastrophic or beneficial.

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So evidence for evolution MUST show how genes evolved, and how various anatomical structures came to be.

I don't understand this sentence at all. Why "must" "evolution" "show" anything? What are you even talking about?

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But again, there has never been even one experiment showing that a gene has evolved,

Oh, nevermind, you're just fucking dumb.

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

or any anatomical structure or any physiological process, and instead of true, scientific evidence, the evolutionary scientists offer assumptions as to how they think that DNA or bones might have evolved.

^fat