Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Are you seriously suggesting that I'm defending Alarti's bet welching? How does it even remotely look like that?
That was my second post on the subject. It was mostly a copy and paste of the first one ( http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=132) from several weeks ago.
He's been dancing around with the whole "Rogean invalidation" deflection for weeks and no one bothered to ask exactly how it worked. No one bothered asking how it works, because it doesn't. I thought it was obvious that by asking for an explanation it'd very quickly become obvious that there wasn't one. I'm not seeing where you're getting that I'm defending him. I've stayed completely out of the matter aside from posting the same question twice.
We all know he straight up broke his word. I'm just not sure how you got the idea I was defending that when I'm pointedly asking that he explain something that has no excuse or logic behind it. |
now it doesn't look like that -- the above is fair. thank you.
the bolded sections are all that was necessary, but in their absence, it looked a lot like tacit approval. i believe you're the first from your guild to explicitly state the above
and your question about rogean seemed to me to be an implication that rogean had no authority to disregard the bet, not a genuine inquiry. i was mistaken