Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Question: Under what theory of absolution would Rogean's opinion or actions eliminate an obligation, and how is it being applied here?
Is it being claimed that Rogean has the authority to dissolve obligations by right of his status, or is the claim simply that he revealed information that displayed fraud within the bet, but not that he himself has acted in a decision making capacity?
What are the exact mechanics of the invalidation?
|
Lol finally! Someone caught on. The whole rogean invalidated my bet was just making light of some post Rogean made that FE thought let Mortiiss off the hook. Rogean pointed out that someone made a bet offer after an action happened. Thereby insinuating the the bet presenter had foreknowledge. However, foreknowledge does not make a bet invalid.
I figure if Rogean having an interaction with a bet scenario invalidates a bet... then why not this time.
Its just dumb FE members being dumb.