Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What I take issue with is the notion that incidental beneficiaries should be punished for actions that were not controlled by them. For example, if it is shown that Aiaus was acting along and surreptitiously, then it would be unfair to issue punishments to the rest of the guild. If you're going to assign vicarious liability ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior), it must be fairly done.
A prime example of an unfair application would be Perun's ninja looting of CT. To punish all of IB for Perun's actions, which clearly exceeded his authority and right, was unjust. (See: http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...5&postcount=79) |
Everquest is not ruled by a court of law.
MFer exploited and his guild directly benefited.
btw your examples are fucking stupid. so I am playing football and I commit an infraction. Instead of moving my team back 10 yards, just make me line up 10 yards back.