Quote:
Originally Posted by maverixdamighty
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ya this part, "Should the uses be allowed in the future? In my opinion, no. However, should we be out for blood for those who have used them in the past? Of that, I am unsure."
So basically since aiaus did it in the past we should ignore it but if it happens again it shouldn't be allowed. How convenient after he was the sole reason we were not able to kill your entire train team due to his obvious exploiting. That is why you are biased and should quit posting.
|
As I elaborated, the comment out for blood wass specifically meant to address the idea that he should be banned. I am simply unsure that such a measure would be consistent with the current precedence regarding punishment in such issues. Again, should such abuse want the stripping of an exemption? Absolutely. Are additional measures such as bans necessary? Again, I am unsure.
It is not that Aiaus' actions should be excused because he did in the past, it is because a ban in this scenario does not seem consistent with how such abuses have been handled in the past. For example, Giegue cited that exemptions have been stripped on red for such conduct. Thus, removal of an exemption here would seem consistent. To elevate the punishment would be a measure that I am unsure is necessary or fair.