Quote:
Originally Posted by girth
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The fact that you actually used it as anything but a joke is laughable.
|
When mentioned, the new proposed variance would have been +/- 6 hours, rather than the flat +6 as was later amended.
In total that is 12 hours of variance per week, per target.
Since you got your panties in a bunch over the overlap, lets give it a base value of 1.42 with 168 hours in a week vs 72 hours of potential variance.
Variance included it clocks in at 41.76 hours. That's a smidge under 25% of the total hours in the week. If you assume that the current state of camping is 100% of the time due with the pre-existing variances, thats still 75%.
But wait, you stated the person's playing time, not the total hours in a week, so the actual value I've given of 168 hours is too high. This means that the actual percentage is going to be 75% time camped
at best. Less than 25% of the time you'll be able to 'play' your character...
What was your line again?
Quote:
Originally Posted by girth
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The issue is not being able to play 85% of the time because you have to be the first 15 in a zone to claim a boss.
|
Weren't you the one giving _me_ shit for pulling numbers out of the air?
Your claim on current situation: 85% of time not able to play.
Proposed situation with +/- 6 hours: >75% of time not able to play.
Less than 10%. Oh god, I am so glad I can play my character so much more than before!!!