Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanthallas
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is a poor analogy because in the case of Trakanon today it was impossible for FE to log out both having been hit by Trak AE and being subject to getting hit by Trak AE again.
I guess impossible is the wrong word...suicidal for their ability to engage Trak is better.
This is all moot, however...why FE was hit and subject to Trak AE in the first place is the problem here, not what FE does about it once it happens. If this logic is applied to every instance where a mob is trained onto another individual or group of people, the person at fault would always be the person or people trained and their inability to deal with it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baramur
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
His wing was. But fine he was on the side of poop hill and his ae hit everyone on poop hill
|
FE stood in los of trakanon and got hit with AEs. If you're looking at the dragon you already knew you were going to eat AEs.
You didn't get trained.
You made bad calls.
1) after logging in and seeing where Trak is, you allowed more people to log in and stay in LOS of trakanon.
2) you made a call to engage a dragon that you had already taken AE/s from without knowing if you had fte or not (or maybe you did?)
This would be the equivalent of me going to pull talendor or sev and you beating me to the punch and I take an AE when it happens. There is no way I could say that you trained me because I took an AE.