Quote:
Originally Posted by Zadrian
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sure, you can say, "but how did the big bang happen? It has to be gods, or humanoid lizards rait??!" The answer is simple, we have yet to find out.
Look at it this way, the world makes a lot more sense when seeking knowledge based on the big bang theory... Meaning that the way it is described to us post-big bang makes a lot more sense because we can see all of the evidence. Scientific discoveries can actually be viewed.
The universe does not function as it is written in the bible, or any other religious texts (world-wide floods, dude carrying the sun in a boat, some folks living on a mountain, or some asshole offering you 72 virgins for blowing yourself up ((which I heard isn't even in the Qu'ran)))
|
A couple things to start. 1) I'm not talking about the big bang in any way, rather the origination of matter that would be required to substantiate a big bang. 2) I'm not making an argument towards a Christian worldview in any way.
You're making a number of stereotypical assumptions under the guise that an argument questioning if matter
could have been created is an abomination to all 'life sciences'. Relax and try to embrace independent thoughtful discussion as opposed to insult.
I do find it humorous that in posts such as yours there is a blatant acknowledgement of nearly complete ignorance about the working of the universe accompanied by a direct assertion that it is certainly not what is described by any religion.